Key result
Automated annular displacement measurement shows strong agreement with manual assessment for TAPSE, MAPSE, and SAPSE.
Why the study?
Automation of annular plane systolic excursion measurements could improve repeatability and applicability in fetal cardiac function assessment, but reliability and correlation with manual measurements need evaluation.
Does an automated tool provide reliable measurements of TAPSE, MAPSE, and SAPSE compared to manual measurement in fetal echocardiography?
Observational (n=40)
Does an automated tool provide reliable measurements of TAPSE, MAPSE, and SAPSE compared to manual measurement in fetal echocardiography?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.90 (95% CI 0.72-0.97)
An automated tool for measuring fetal annular plane systolic excursion shows excellent agreement with manual measurements, potentially aiding less experienced practitioners in assessing fetal cardiac function.
Automated fetal annular measurements may aid less experienced examiners; leaves open prospective outcome validation before clinical adoption.
Objectives Longitudinal ventricular function can be assessed by measuring the annular plane systolic excursion at tricuspid (TAPSE), mitral (MAPSE) or septal (SAPSE) level. This information could be useful in obstetrical practice since common maternal-fetal conditions may modify fetal cardiac function. Automation of these parameters could improve repeatability, enhancing applicability in clinical practice. Methods Data was prospectively acquired from a mixed cohort of healthy fetuses and those affected by congenital heart disease between 19 + 6 and 36 + 6 gestational weeks. From 90 available STIC volumes, 40 were selected based on a quality scoring system, and TAPSE, MAPSE, and SAPSE were measured by three different operators at different levels of expertise. A recently developed automated tool was applied to calculate TAPSE, MAPSE, and SAPSE from 4D STIC volumes. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was used for analysis. Results Manual intra-observer repeatability was high for TAPSE, MAPSE, and SAPSE (ICCs 0.92–0.99 (95 % CI 0.86; 0.99), 0.89–0.99 (95 % CI 0.81; 0.94) and 0.89–0.98 (95 % CI 0.83–0.98) respectively). Manual inter-observer repeatability was highest between the operators with the highest and intermediate experience rather than the least experienced. With clear annulus visibility, agreement between automated and manual was excellent for TAPSE and MAPSE (ICCs 0.90 (95 % CI 0.72; 0.97) and 0.97 (95 % CI 0.88; 0.99) respectively) and good for SAPSE (ICC 0.76 (95 % CI −0.56; 0.98)). Conclusions Automated annular displacement measurement generates excellent results for the degree of agreement with manual measurement for TAPSE and MAPSE, and good for SAPSE under specific conditions. This validated tool may be beneficial for practitioners less experienced in fetal cardiac function assessment. Our encouraging results suggest that further study of the automated method of annular systolic excursion is appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erenbourg et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy fetuses and congenital heart disease (n=40). Automated annular displacement measurement vs. Manual measurement was evaluated on Agreement between automated and manual measurement for TAPSE (ICC 0.90, 95% CI 0.72-0.97). Automated annular displacement measurement showed excellent agreement with manual measurement for TAPSE (ICC 0.90) and MAPSE (ICC 0.97), and good agreement for SAPSE (ICC 0.76).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: