Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose To evaluate the long-term outcomes, safety, and feasibility of balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) performed under local anesthesia in patients with baro-challenge-induced and obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). Methods This prospective observational cohort study included 65 adult patients (89 ears) undergoing in-office BDET under local anesthesia between May 2020 and June 2023. Symptoms were assessed using the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Clinical examination, Valsalva maneuver, tympanometry, and pure-tone audiometry were additionally evaluated when available. Follow-up was performed at 3, 12, and 24 months. Results Thirty-seven patients had baro-challenge-induced ETD and 28 had obstructive ETD (OETD). All 65 patients underwent BDET under local anesthesia, with a mean intraoperative pain score of 5/10. Mean ETDQ-7 scores improved significantly in the overall cohort (p < 0.0001), with improvement maintained at 12 and 24 months. Improvement was significant in baro-challenge-induced ETD but not in OETD. Subjective ability to perform the Valsalva maneuver improved significantly in both groups, while air-conduction thresholds improved significantly in the baro-challenge group. One self-limiting cervicofacial subcutaneous emphysema occurred, with no major complications. Conclusion In-office BDET under local anesthesia is a safe and feasible treatment for ETD, with symptomatic improvement maintained for up to 24 months. Patients with baro-challenge-induced ETD appear to benefit most, whereas outcomes in OETD are more variable. These findings highlight the importance of appropriate patient selection and counseling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheppard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: