Key result
4D ICE during LAAO is linked to ~257% higher odds of persistent iASD versus no ICE.
Why the study?
Does the use of left atrial intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) with double transseptal access increase the incidence of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) in patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO)?
Cohort (n=203)
None
No
Does the use of left atrial intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) with double transseptal access increase the incidence of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) in patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO)?
Odds Ratio: 3.57 (95% CI 1.52–8.38)
Absolute Event Rate: 58.6% vs 27.2%
p-value: p=0.001
The use of left atrial ICE during LAAO with single-puncture double transseptal access is associated with a significantly higher rate of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defects compared to procedures without left atrial ICE, though this was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes at early follow-up.
LA ICE during LAAO was associated with higher persistent iASD rates; leaves open clinical sequelae and need for randomized confirmation.
Background Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) is a known consequence of transseptal puncture (TSP). Large-bore double transseptal access through a single TSP is commonly used for intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). This study evaluated the incidence and clinical outcomes of persistent iASD following this approach. Methods We retrospectively reviewed LAAO procedures at a single academic center from January 2020 to December 2024. Cases were grouped as: (1) 4D ICE with double transseptal access ( n = 58), (2) 2D ICE with double transseptal access ( n = 64), or (3) no left atrial (LA) ICE ( n = 81). Patients were included if they had follow-up imaging (TEE or cardiac CT). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of persistent iASD. Results Among 203 patients (age 77.1 ± 6.6 years; 59% male), follow-up occurred at 58.0 ± 25.2 days. Persistent iASD was detected in 88 patients (43%). ICE-guided cases had a higher incidence of iASD compared with no LA ICE (54.1% vs. 27.2%; p < 0.001), with no difference between 2D and 4D ICE ( p = 0.340). On multivariable analysis, both 2D and 4D ICE were independently associated with increased odds of persistent iASD (2D ICE: OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.46–8.17; 4D ICE: OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.52–8.38). Coronary artery disease was associated with increased odds (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.12–5.28), while hypertension was associated with decreased odds (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18–0.96). Persistent iASD was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Conclusions Persistent iASD is common following LAAO, occurring in 43% of patients at early follow-up. Left atrial ICE use is independently associated with increased odds of persistent iASD, with similar rates between 2D and 4D ICE techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Culler et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=203). 4D intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guidance vs. No left atrial ICE was evaluated on Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) on follow-up imaging (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.52-8.38, p=0.001). Use of 4D intracardiac echocardiography during left atrial appendage occlusion was independently associated with increased odds of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect compared to no left atrial ICE (OR 3.57).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: