Key result
ICE-guided LAAC linked to high procedural success and ~73% fewer ischemic events versus predicted burden.
Why the study?
Intracardiac echocardiography has emerged as a less invasive alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage closure guidance, but long-term outcome data remain limited.
Does ICE-guided LAAC provide safe and effective long-term outcomes in patients requiring left atrial appendage closure?
Cohort (n=411)
No
Does ICE-guided LAAC provide safe and effective long-term outcomes in patients requiring left atrial appendage closure?
Effect estimate: observed-to-expected ratio 0.27 (95% CI 0.17-0.41)
ICE-guided LAAC demonstrates high procedural success and favorable long-term outcomes, with a 73% relative reduction in ischemic events compared to predicted risk.
High procedural success with ICE-guided LAAC supports feasibility in experienced centers; leaves open randomized TEE comparisons.
BACKGROUND Intraprocedural imaging is pivotal for guidance of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) to minimize complications and ensure optimal sealing. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), although long-term outcome data remain limited. OBJECTIVES To evaluate procedural success and long-term clinical outcomes of ICE-guided LAAC in a large single-center cohort. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing ICE-guided LAAC (January 2009-March 2024) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression assessed time-to-event outcomes and mortality predictors; supplementary Aalen-Johansen competing-risk analyses derived cumulative incidence functions (CIF) for non-fatal endpoints, with all-cause mortality as the competing event. RESULTS Among 411 patients, technical and procedural success were 99.8% and 94.9%, respectively. Major adverse events occurred in 5.1%, mainly pericardial tamponade (2.9%); no in-hospital deaths. Over a mean follow-up of 44.2months, all-cause mortality was 45.3% (annualized rate 10.9%). Twenty-one ischemic events occurred (annualized rate 1.7%), yielding an observed-to-expected ratio of 0.27 (95%CI: 0.17-0.41) versus the CHA₂DS₂-VASc-predicted burden (73% relative reduction). Major bleeding occurred in 3.2% (annualized rate 1.1%). Five-year CIF estimates were 5.12% for stroke/TIA and 2.65% for major bleeding (ISTH). Advancing age, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and reduced LVEF independently predicted all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS ICE-guided LAAC is safe and highly effective, with favorable long-term outcomes and low ischemic and bleeding event rates in a high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pastormerlo et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure (n=411). ICE-guided left atrial appendage closure vs. CHA₂DS₂-VASc-predicted burden was evaluated on ischemic events (observed-to-expected ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.41). ICE-guided left atrial appendage closure achieved 94.9% procedural success and a 73% relative reduction in ischemic events versus predicted burden (O/E ratio 0.27; 95% CI 0.17-0.41).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: