Key result
ICE-guided LAAC with LAmbre yields 0% severe complications in patients with LAA thrombus.
Why the study?
Data on left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with LAA thrombus are limited and mostly guided by transesophageal echocardiography, leaving the feasibility of ICE guidance unknown.
Is intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) feasible and safe in patients with existing left atrial appendage thrombus?
Observational (n=12)
Is intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) feasible and safe in patients with existing left atrial appendage thrombus?
ICE-guided LAAC using the LAmbre device appears feasible and safe in patients with existing LAA thrombus, with no major periprocedural or short-term follow-up complications observed in this small cohort.
ICE-guided LAAC with LAmbre appears feasible in LAA thrombus; hypothesis-generating and requires larger trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Data regarding left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus are limited. Recently published cases have mostly been guided by transesophageal echocardiography. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is now widely used during LAAC procedures. OBJECTIVE: This is the first study to report the feasibility of LAAC in patients with LAA thrombus guided by ICE. METHODS: Patients with persistent LAA thrombus despite anticoagulation or contraindications to anticoagulation who underwent a modified ICE-guided LAAC procedure between June 2021 and April 2023 were included. Periprocedural events and clinical outcomes during follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (mean age 65 ± 7 years; 92% male) were included: 10 with persistent LAA thrombus and 2 with contraindications to anticoagulation. Most of the thrombus was at the apex (n = 6), followed by the body (n = 3) and the ostium (n = 3). A LAmbre device was used and successfully implanted in all patients with the guidance of ICE. No thrombotic material was retrieved from patients with the protection of cerebral protection device (n = 11). No patient experienced severe periprocedural complications. All patients completed transesophageal echocardiography follow-up, and no device-related thrombus or peridevice leak > 3 mm was detected. None of the patients experienced stroke/transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, or major bleeding events during a median follow-up of 147 days (interquartile range 80-306 days). CONCLUSION: LAAC using the LAmbre device guided by ICE may be feasible in patients with LAA thrombus when performed by experienced operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Left atrial appendage thrombus (n=12). ICE-guided left atrial appendage closure was evaluated on Severe periprocedural complications, stroke/transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, or major bleeding events. ICE-guided left atrial appendage closure using the LAmbre device was successfully performed in 12 patients with LAA thrombus, with 0% severe periprocedural complications or stroke events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: