In the point-of-care, microfluidic, and biochemistry areas, the sample volume is becoming as small as µL order. In this study, we introduce a cyclone concentration pipette that integrates quantitative concentration and sample ejection functions for liquid volume conversion (mL to µL). The concentration pipette is a three-scale polypropylene (PP) tube comprising a cm-scale cyclone concentration chamber, a mm-scale channel for keeping the 10 µL liquid, and a µm-scale orifice (105 µm ± 6 µm) for ejecting liquid. The cyclone concentration system requires continuous observation to determine the endpoint (10 µL). This work introduces an automated control system designed for precise control of a 10 µL volume. The system is built on a Raspberry Pi platform with a Logitech C920 USB camera (1920 × 1080). It monitors the tube in real-time using three parallel detection methods: a convolutional neural network (CNN) for liquid state classification, a MOG2 background subtractor for droplet movement detection, and temporal pixel variance analysis across a 40-frame rolling window for flow state monitoring. When no activity is detected by any method for 30 consecutive seconds, the Raspberry Pi automatically closes a KOGANEI proportional pneumatic valve via a PWM-to-voltage converter (0–10 V). The system automatically terminated concentration without manual intervention. For the water concentration, the mean final volume was 10.6 μL with a standard deviation of 1.65 μL, corresponding to a coefficient of variation (CV) of 15.6% and a bias of + 6.0% relative to the target volume of 10 μL ( n = 10). The optimized imaging conditions improved the stability of endpoint detection and volume control, resulting in a final volume of 10.4 μL (CV = 8.2%) with a bias of + 4.0% relative to the 10 μL target, demonstrating acceptable endpoint control accuracy. For the Sunset Yellow solution, a recovery of > 90% and a concentration factor of approximately 90-fold were achieved, indicating that the automated control strategy maintained high sample recovery while achieving efficient concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: