Key result
Macrolide maintenance therapy in patients with bronchiectasis was associated with a 32% reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 0.68) without increasing the risk of severe arrhythmias.
Why the study?
A comprehensive assessment of the cardiovascular benefits and safety profile of macrolide maintenance therapy in patients with bronchiectasis was lacking.
Does macrolide maintenance therapy reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with bronchiectasis?
Cohort (n=3,137)
Yes
Does macrolide maintenance therapy reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with bronchiectasis?
Hazard Ratio: 0.68 (95% CI 0.52–0.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 16.38% vs 24.11%
Number Needed to Treat: 46
p-value: p=0.007
Macrolide maintenance therapy in patients with bronchiectasis is associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of severe arrhythmias.
Should not yet change practice in bronchiectasis; hypothesis-generating for macrolide cardiovascular effects and requires randomized confirmation.
Background Macrolide maintenance therapy (MMT) has demonstrated notable efficacy in reducing exacerbation in patients with bronchiectasis, which is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events. However, a comprehensive assessment of the cardiovascular benefits and safety profile of MMT in this population is lacking. Methods This territory-wide cohort study analysed patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis in Hong Kong between 2001 and 2018. Patients were classified as MMT receivers or macrolide non-receivers based on the administration of MMT. Propensity score (PS) matching was employed for confounding factors adjustment. The primary outcome of interest was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. The safety outcome was the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was utilised to compare the incidence of outcomes across the two groups. Results A total of 22 895 patients with bronchiectasis were identified. Following 1:2 PS matching, the final cohort consisted of 3137 individuals, with 1123 MMT receivers and 2014 macrolide non-receivers. MMT administration was associated with a significantly reduced risk of MACE (16.38versus24.11 events per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio (HR) 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.90). Importantly, the use of MMT was not associated with elevated risk of ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death (7.17versus7.67 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60–1.44). Conclusions The administration of MMT in patients with bronchiectasis was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of MACE, without any evidence suggesting an increased risk of severe arrhythmia-related adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Bronchiectasis (n=3,137). Macrolide maintenance therapy vs. Macrolide non-receivers was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.90, p=0.007). Macrolide maintenance therapy in patients with bronchiectasis was associated with a 32% reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 0.68) without increasing the risk of severe arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: