Key result
JSGS and ACS use nationwide registries to drive improvements in surgical care.
Why the study?
The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program collaborated to improve surgical quality using nationwide clinical registries in Japan and the USA.
Collaborative use of nationwide surgical registries between Japan and the USA provides data to drive improvements in surgical care and identify healthcare system weaknesses.
The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery (JSGS) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) have collaboratively developed several clinical projects since 2011 using two nationwide clinical registries with the goal of achieving further improvement of surgical quality in both countries. In this review, the historical viewpoints and the collaboration between JSGS and ACS and their use of nationwide registries [National Clinical Database (NCD) and NSQIP] for research are reviewed. We have carried out a joint project, the 30-day Mortality Risk Model Study and, currently, we are working on several joint projects such as the Morbidity-Mortality Study, Japan-USA Calibration Study, Geriatric Study, and Safety Culture Study as well as Auditing in JSGS/NCD with reference to the NSQIP method. These joint projects will continue to provide us with important information and data to drive improvements in surgical care in both countries. This will also help us to identify any unknown weaknesses in the health-care systems of the USA and Japan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marubashi et al. (2019) conducted a review in Surgical quality. Surgical quality improvement programs was evaluated. Collaborative projects between the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and the American College of Surgeons using nationwide registries aim to drive improvements in surgical care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: