This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The mechanisms by which cells respond and adapt to oxidative stress are largely unknown but are key to developing a rationale for cancer therapies that target antioxidant pathways. APR-246 is a mutant-p53 targeted therapeutic currently under clinical investigation in myeloid dysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia 1 . Whilst the mechanism of action of APR-246 is thought to be reactivation of wild-type p53 activity through covalent modification of cysteine residues in the core domain of mutant-p53 protein 2,3 , here we report that the anti-neoplastic capacity of APR-246 lies predominantly in the conjugation of free cysteine. Genome-wide CRISPR perturbation screening, metabolite profiling and proteomics in response to APR-246 treatment in mutant-p53 cancer cells highlighted the role of GSH and mitochondrial metabolism in determining APR-246 efficacy. APR-246 sensitivity was increased through loss of key enzymes in mitochondrial one-carbon metabolism, SHMT2 and MTHFD1L , due to diminished glycine supply for de novo GSH synthesis. Critically, we show that APR-246 induces iron-dependent, apoptotic machinery-independent cell death, ferroptosis. Whole-cell proteomics analyses indicated an upregulation of proteins involved in iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis (eg. FDX1). GSH, acetyl-CoA and NADH levels were also depleted in APR-246 treated cells. Importantly, we found that APR-246 inhibits iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis in the mitochondria of cancer cells through cysteine conjugation. This work not only details novel determinants of APR-246 activity in cancer cells, but also provides a clinical roadmap for targeting antioxidant pathways in tumours - beyond targeting mutant-p53 tumours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujihara et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: