Key result
Professional football athlete status is linked to a ~71% higher SARS-CoV-2 infection rate versus staff.
Why the study?
The SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among professional football athletes and staff after resuming competition during the 2020 season in São Paulo was not well characterized.
Cohort (n=6,500)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 1.71 (95% CI 1.42–2.06)
Absolute Event Rate: 11.7% vs 7.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Resuming professional football during a period of high community transmission led to a high SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among athletes and staff despite weekly testing.
Suggests athlete-specific protections during high-transmission periods; leaves open causal factors and optimal mitigation strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in a cohort of 6500 professional athletes and staff during the 2020 football (soccer) season in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 4269 players (87% male, age: 21.7±4.2 years) and 2231 staff (87% male, age: 42.6±11.9 years) from 122 teams (women: n=16) involved in eight leagues (women: n=2), which took place in São Paulo, Brazil. Between 4 July 2020 and 21 December 2020, swab samples were collected weekly (n=29 507) and tested for SARS-Cov-2 via reverse transcription-PCR by an accredited laboratory commissioned by the São Paulo Football Federation. We contacted the medical staff of each team with positive cases to collect information on disease severity. RESULTS: Among 662 PCR-confirmed cases, 501 were athletes and 161 were staff. The new infection rate was 11.7% and 7.2% for athletes and staff, respectively. Athletes were more susceptible to infection than staff (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.06, p<0.001), although with lower chance for moderate to severe disease (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.54, p=0.012). Six teams had ≥20 individuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, whereas 19 teams had ≥10 confirmed cases. Twenty-five mass outbreaks were identified (≥5 infections within a team in a 2-week period). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was similar in athletes and staff as the general population in São Paulo. CONCLUSION: Despite weekly testing and other preventive measures, we found a high SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in athletes and staff after resuming football, which coincides with the high prevalence of infection in the community during the same period. These data may assist policy-makers and sports federations for determining if and when it is safe to resume competitions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gualano et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=6,500). Being a professional athlete vs. Team staff was evaluated on SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.42-2.06, p=<0.001). Being a professional football athlete was associated with a higher rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to being team staff (11.7% vs 7.2%; OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.42-2.06, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: