Key result
3D HR-VWI shows a ~0.95 correlation with DSA for measuring in-stent stenosis degree.
Why the study?
Assessment of stent lumen and vessel wall changes after stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis using 3D HR-VWI was needed to evaluate its accuracy and clinical utility.
Does 3D high-resolution vessel wall imaging accurately assess in-stent restenosis compared to digital subtraction angiography in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis?
Observational (n=33)
No
Does 3D high-resolution vessel wall imaging accurately assess in-stent restenosis compared to digital subtraction angiography in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis?
Effect estimate: r = 0.95
p-value: p=<0.0001
3D high-resolution vessel wall imaging provides consistent measurements of in-stent restenosis compared to digital subtraction angiography and can reveal the underlying cause of restenosis.
May support noninvasive monitoring of in-stent restenosis; leaves open prospective validation against DSA in larger cohorts.
Purpose This study aimed to assess stent lumen and vessel wall changes using 3D high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic arterial stenosis after stenting. Patients and Methods: We followed up 33 patients after stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis using 3D HR-VWI (pre- and post-contrast T1 weighted images [T1WI]), time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Two neuroradiologists measured the in-stent restenosis degree on three modalities. The linear association of stenosis measurements obtained by three different modalities was determined through Spearman’s correlation analysis. Between-reviewer agreement regarding the stenosis degree on HR-VWI was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Further, we evaluated stent wall characteristics, including wall changes and enhancement on pre- and post-contrast T1WI images, respectively. Results All patients presented signal loss on TOF MRA at the stenting location. Eleven patients showed in-stent stenosis, with the stenosis degree ranging from 19–100% (occlusion). There was a strong correlation between the in-stent stenosis degrees on HR-VWI and DSA. There was excellent between-reviewer agreement in the stenosis degree (ICC: 0.97). Among the 11 patients, 9 patients presented with vessel wall thickness and enhancement while 2 patients showed intraluminal thrombosis with high-signal filling in the lumen on 3D HR-VWI. Conclusions The stenosis degree measured on 3D HR-VWI was consistent with the gold standard DSA. In patients with in-stent stenosis, 3D HR-VWI can reveal the restenosis cause to guide subsequent treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis after stenting (n=33). 3D high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) vs. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was evaluated on Correlation of in-stent stenosis degree between 3D HR-VWI and DSA (r = 0.95, p=<0.0001). 3D high-resolution vessel wall imaging demonstrated a strong correlation with the gold standard digital subtraction angiography for measuring in-stent stenosis degree (r = 0.95, P < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: