Key result
LMWH increases live births ~19% and reduces miscarriages in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Why the study?
The roles of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) were assessed due to uncertainty about its effectiveness.
Does low molecular weight heparin improve live births and reduce miscarriage rates in pregnant women with recurrent pregnancy loss?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,854)
Does low molecular weight heparin improve live births and reduce miscarriage rates in pregnant women with recurrent pregnancy loss?
Relative Risk: 1.19 (95% CI 1.03–1.38)
p-value: p=0.02
LMWH may be an effective treatment to improve live birth rates and reduce miscarriages in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
LMWH improves live births in RPL; confirms RCT meta-analysis benefit and supports consideration in unexplained cases.
To assess the roles of the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The relevant studies of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved, and the systematic evaluation was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched by using keywords, including low-molecular-weight heparin or LMWH, and recurrent miscarriage or recurrent pregnancy loss in pregnant women from their earliest data to February 2020. Two investigators independently evaluated eligibility. Risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined. To pool the results, this meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model due to the high heterogeneity among these eight studies. A total of eight RCTs involving 1854 participants were included in the meta-analysis involving 963 patients with RPL who were prescribed LMWH (enoxaparin, tinzaparin, or dalteparin) alone and 891 patients who were treated with no LMWH interventions (placebo, folic acid or non-treatment) were compared. Pooled data from the remaining eight RCTs showed the differences between intervention groups and control groups. Compared with control groups, LMWH had significantly improved live births (RR,1.19; 95%CI, 1.03 to 1.38; P = 0.02), and reduced miscarriage rates (RR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.43 to 0.91; P = 0.01). The study suggested that LMWH could improve the live births and reduce the miscarriage rates of RPL. Therefore, LMWH might be a good treatment choice for women with unexplained PRL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Recurrent pregnancy loss (n=1,854). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) vs. No LMWH interventions (placebo, folic acid or non-treatment) was evaluated on Live births (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.38, p=0.02). Low molecular weight heparin significantly improved live births (RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.03-1.38; P=0.02) and reduced miscarriage rates in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: