This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Freezing of gait, a disabling episodic symptom, is difficult to assess as the exact begin‐ and endpoint of an episode is not easy to specify. This hampers scientific and clinical progress. The current golden standard is video annotation by two independent raters. However, the comparison of the two ratings gives rise to non‐overlapping, gray areas. Objective To provide a guideline for dealing with these gray areas. Methods/Results We propose a standardized procedure for handling the gray areas based on two parameters, the tolerance and correction parameter. Furthermore, we recommend the use of positive agreement, negative agreement, and prevalence index to report interrater agreement instead of the commonly used intraclass correlation coefficient or Cohen's kappa. This theoretical guideline was implemented in an open‐source practical tool, FOGtool ( https://github.com/helenacockx/FOGtool ). Conclusion This paper aims to contribute to the standardization of freezing of gait assessment, thereby improving data sharing procedures and replicability of study results .
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cockx et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: