Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Increasing evidence indicates a gut microbiome-brain axis, but more robust statistical methods are needed to solidify this connection. In a large phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (PUNCH CD3; NCT03244644), fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA; RBL, previously RBX2660), was effective in preventing recurrent Clostridium difficile infections, and trial participants had significant gut microbiome and metabolome shifts concurrent with significant changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Advanced statistical methods were applied to data from this trial to further explore and demonstrate associations between changing HRQOL and microbiome or metabolome changes. METHODS: A categorical statistical analysis queried whether patient-reported Cdiff32 HRQOL scores were more likely to improve after RBL than after placebo among PUNCH CD3 participants, and a Dirichlet-multinominal recursive partitioning model assessed whether mental domain Cdiff32 HRQOL scores were linked to participants' fecal microbiome or bile acid compositions. RESULTS: Cdiff32 mental domain HRQOL scores were more likely to be improved after RBL administration compared with placebo among treatment responders. Cdiff32 mental domain scores were associated with changing gut microbiome and metabolome compositions, with a gradient of increased Clostridia and Bacteroidia and increased secondary bile acid predominance associated with better Cdiff32 scores. CONCLUSIONS: The microbiota-gut-brain axis is posited to modulate health-related quality of life, microbiome, and metabolome changes through immune, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system functions in patients with recurrent C. difficile infection following RBL administration. These analyses provide a novel approach for investigating multi-omics data and categorical health-related quality of life questionnaires and generate new insights for further clinical studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03244644.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: