Key result
Exenatide, liraglutide, and sitagliptin show no effect on skin capillary perfusion versus placebo in T2DM.
Why the study?
The effects of GLP-1-based therapies on microvascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were unclear.
Do GLP-1-based therapies affect microvascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
RCT (n=57)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Do GLP-1-based therapies affect microvascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
p-value: p=>0.05
GLP-1-based therapies do not appear to affect microvascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, suggesting their glucose-lowering effects are not mediated through microvascular responses.
GLP-1-based therapies do not enhance microvascular function in type 2 diabetes; confirms glucose-lowering effects are independent of skin capillary perfusion.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1-based therapies (ie, GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors) on microvascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We studied 57 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean±SD age: 62.8±6.9 years; body mass index: 31.8±4.1 kg/m(2); HbA1c [glycated hemoglobin] 7.3±0.6%) in an acute and 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted at the Diabetes Center of the VU University Medical Center. In the acute study, the GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide (therapeutic concentrations) or placebo (saline 0.9%) was administered intravenously. During the 12-week study, patients received the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide (1.8 mg daily), the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin (100 mg daily), or matching placebos. Capillary perfusion was assessed by nailfold skin capillary videomicroscopy and vasomotion by laser Doppler fluxmetry, in the fasting state and after a high-fat mixed meal. In neither study, treatment affected fasting or postprandial capillary perfusion compared with placebo (P>0.05). In the fasting state, acute exenatide infusion increased neurogenic vasomotion domain power, while reducing myogenic domain power (both P<0.05). After the meal, exenatide increased endothelial domain power (P<0.05). In the 12-week study, no effects on vasomotion were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite modest changes in vasomotion, suggestive of sympathetic nervous system activation and improved endothelial function, acute exenatide infusion does not affect skin capillary perfusion in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Twelve-week treatment with liraglutide or sitagliptin has no effect on capillary perfusion or vasomotion in these patients. Our data suggest that the effects of GLP-1-based therapies on glucose are not mediated through microvascular responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smits et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=57). GLP-1-based therapies (exenatide, liraglutide, sitagliptin) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Fasting or postprandial capillary perfusion (p=>0.05). Acute exenatide infusion and 12-week treatment with liraglutide or sitagliptin did not significantly affect fasting or postprandial skin capillary perfusion compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: