Key result
IONM linked to ~28% greater RLN identification and fewer injuries versus visualization alone during thyroid reoperation.
Why the study?
Reoperative thyroidectomy has a higher incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and nerve identification is challenging during reoperations.
Does intraoperative nerve monitoring reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in patients undergoing thyroid reoperation?
Cohort (n=109)
No
Does intraoperative nerve monitoring reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in patients undergoing thyroid reoperation?
Absolute Event Rate: 96.8% vs 75.4%
p-value: p=< .05
Intraoperative nerve monitoring during thyroid reoperations improves recurrent laryngeal nerve identification and reduces surgeon-related nerve injuries compared to visualization alone.
Supports IONM in thyroid reoperations to reduce RLN injury; hypothesis-generating, needs RCTs before practice change.
Reoperative thyroidectomy is challenging for surgeons because of the higher incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy. RLN identification is the gold standard during thyroidectomy; however, it is sometimes difficult to perform thyroid reoperations. In recent years, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) has gained increased acceptance, and the use of IONM can be a valuable adjunct to visual identification. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of IONM during thyroid reoperation.A total of 109 patients who met our criteria at the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University from January 2010 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the IONM group and the visualization-alone group (VA group) according to whether neuromonitoring was used during the operation. The patients' characteristics, perioperative data, and intraoperative information including the RLN identification, time of RLNs confirmation, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and the rate of RLN injury were collected.Sixty-five procedures (94 RLNs at risk) were performed in the IONM group, whereas 44 (65 RLNs at risk) were in the VA group. The rate of RLN identification was 96.8% in the IONM group and 75.4% in the VA group (P < .05). The incidence of RLN injury was 5.3% in the IONM group and 13.8% in the VA group (P > .05). The incidence of surgeon-related RLN injury rate was 0% in the IONM group compared to 7.7% in the VA group (P < .05), but the tumor-related or scar-related RLN injury rate between the 2 groups were not significantly different (4.3% vs 3.1%, 1.1% vs 3.1%, P > .05).IONM in thyroid reoperation was helpful in improving the RLN identification rate and reducing the surgeon-related RLN injury rate, but was ineffective in reducing the tumor-related and scar-related RLN injury rate. In the future, multicenter prospective studies with large sample sizes may be needed to further assess the role of IONM in thyroid reoperations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pei et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Thyroid reoperation (n=109). Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) vs. Visualization-alone (VA) was evaluated on Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) identification (p=< .05). Intraoperative nerve monitoring during thyroid reoperation improved RLN identification (96.8% vs 75.4%, P<0.05) and reduced surgeon-related RLN injury (0% vs 7.7%, P<0.05) versus visualization alone.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: