Key result
A VTIQRST-Z cutoff modestly predicts abnormal RV variables in RBBB with an AUC of 0.66.
Why the study?
Right bundle branch block can be benign or associated with right ventricular functional and structural abnormalities, but optimal ECG markers for RV abnormalities are unclear.
Does electrocardiographic Z-axis QRS-T voltage-time-integral better correlate with echocardiographic right ventricular size and function compared to QRS duration and lead V1 R' in patients with right bundle branch block?
Observational (n=782)
Does electrocardiographic Z-axis QRS-T voltage-time-integral better correlate with echocardiographic right ventricular size and function compared to QRS duration and lead V1 R' in patients with right bundle branch block?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.66
p-value: p=<0.0001
In patients with right bundle branch block, Z-axis QRS-T voltage-time-integral is a stronger predictor of right ventricular dysfunction and adverse remodeling than traditional markers like QRS duration and lead V1 R'.
May support Z-axis VTI for RV assessment in RBBB; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Right bundle branch block (RBBB) can be benign or associated with right ventricular (RV) functional and structural abnormalities. Our aim was to evaluate QRS-T voltage-time-integral (VTI) compared to QRS duration and lead V1 R' as markers for RV abnormalities. We included adults with an ECG demonstrating RBBB and echocardiogram obtained within 3 months of each other, between 2010 and 2020. VTIQRS and VTIQRST were obtained for 12 ECG leads, reconstructed vectorcardiographic X, Y, Z leads and root-mean-squared 3D ECG. Age, sex and BSA adjusted linear regressions were used to assess associations of QRS duration, amplitudes, VTIs and lead V1 R' duration/VTI with echocardiographic tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV tissue Doppler imaging S′, basal and mid diameter, and systolic pressure (RVSP). Among 782 patients (33% women, age 71 ± 14 years) with RBBB, R' duration in lead V1 was modestly associated with RV S′, RV diameters and RVSP (all p ≤ 0.03). QRS duration was more strongly associated with RV diameters (both p < 0.0001). AmplitudeQRS-Z was modestly correlated with all 5 RV echocardiographic variables (all p ≤ 0.02). VTIR’-V1 was more strongly associated with TAPSE, RV S′ and RVSP (all p ≤ 0.0003). VTIQRS-Z and VTIQRST-Z were among the strongest correlates of the 5 RV variables (all p < 0.0001). VTIQRST-Z.√BSA cutoff of ≥62 μVsm had sensitivity 62.7% and specificity 65.7% for predicting ≥3 of 5 abnormal RV variables (AUC 0.66; men 0.71, women 0.60). In patients with RBBB, VTIQRST-Z is a stronger predictor of RV dysfunction and adverse remodeling than QRS duration and lead V1 R'.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fairbank et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Right bundle branch block (RBBB) (n=782). Z-axis QRS-T voltage-time-integral (VTIQRST-Z) vs. QRS duration and lead V1 R' was evaluated on Correlation with echocardiographic right ventricular size and function (AUC 0.66, p=<0.0001). In patients with right bundle branch block, a VTIQRST-Z.√BSA cutoff of ≥62 μVsm predicted ≥3 of 5 abnormal right ventricular variables with 62.7% sensitivity and 65.7% specificity (AUC 0.66).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: