Key result
Higher Cardiometabolic Index linked to ~81% greater odds of prevalent CVD.
Why the study?
Conventional cardiovascular risk models often fail to capture underlying metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms of CVD.
Does a SHAP-based machine learning framework integrating novel cardiometabolic biomarkers improve cardiovascular disease risk stratification in NHANES participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=7,231)
Does a SHAP-based machine learning framework integrating novel cardiometabolic biomarkers improve cardiovascular disease risk stratification in NHANES participants?
Odds Ratio: 1.807 (95% CI 1.163–2.809)
p-value: p=0.009
Integrating the Cardiometabolic Index into a machine learning framework alongside traditional risk factors provides acceptable discriminative performance for CVD risk stratification.
May complement traditional factors in ML-based CVD models; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide.However, conventional risk models often fail to capture its underlying metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms.In this study, we aim to develop and validate an explainable SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based machine learning (ML) framework that integrates novel cardiometabolic biomarkers-Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), Cardiometabolic Index (CMI), and Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI)-with traditional risk factors for cardiovascular risk stratification.Methods: To classify prevalent CVD and perform cardiovascular risk stratification in our study of 7,231 participants from the 2007-2018 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we incorporated 17 variables spanning the four domains of demographics, lifestyle, comorbidities, and metabolic biomarkers.Five ML models-logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, XGBoost, and a soft-voting ensemble-were trained using 5-fold cross-validation.We applied SHAP analysis to facilitate feature-level interpretability.Results: The performances of the logistic regression and the soft-voting ensemble models were comparable (test area under the curve = 0.837; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.805-0.869).Logistic Regression was selected as the final model based on its high sensitivity (0.786 vs. 0.443) and simple structure.Unlike VAI and AISI, CMI was independently associated with CVD (odds ratio, 1.807; 95% CI, 1.163-2.809;P = 0.009) in surveyweighted regression analyses of the fully adjusted model.The SHAP analysis identified age, hypertension, and CMI as the most influential risk factors.Among the novel biomarkers, CMI showed the strongest contribution, VAI demonstrated a moderate contribution, and AISI showed minimal impact on model outputs.Conclusion: By integrating VAI, CMI, and AISI into the SHAP-based ML framework, it improves the interpretability of the framework with acceptable discriminative performance for CVD risk stratification.In addition to the dominant traditional risk factors, CMI contributes cardiometabolic information to support its role as a complementary marker.Although longitudinal validation is required, our findings highlight the potential of explainable ML to enhance transparent risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhai et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=7,231). Cardiometabolic Index (CMI) vs. Lower CMI was evaluated on Prevalent cardiovascular disease (OR 1.807, 95% CI 1.163-2.809, p=0.009). The Cardiometabolic Index (CMI) was independently associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease (OR 1.807) in a fully adjusted model, highlighting its potential as a complementary risk marker.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: