Background: Reducing low-value care (LVC) remains a significant challenge in healthcare systems, despite efforts for de-implementation. To facilitate de-implementation payers may use provider Audit & Feedback (A&F). This study aims to examine trends in LVC following a payer-initiated A&F program, and to explore whether this association varies across hospital payment models. Methods: Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the trend in LVC in hospitals, its correlation with an A&F intervention, and whether this varied with payment models including fee-for-service (FFS), global budget (GB), cost ceiling (CC) and gradual tariff (GT). To assess this, we used hospital level claims data from a large nationwide Dutch health insurer on 70 hospitals in the period 2017-2022. The primary outcome was the yearly proportion of LVC per hospital. Independent variables were time, market share and payment models. We hypothesized that payer-initiated A&F had a stronger impact in hospitals were the payer had a larger market share, and that the effect would be stronger still for hospitals with financial incentives to reduce production. Results: LVC showed a small, but significant decline over time (odds ratio [OR]: 0.98; 95% confidence level [CI]: 0.98-0.99). LVC tended to be higher in hospitals where the payer had a higher market share (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05). The CC model was associated with an increase in LVC (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.99–1.03). The other payment models were associated with a decrease in LVC. The FFS model exhibited the smallest reduction in LVC (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.98-0.99), and the GT model (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99-1.03) showed similar patterns in LVC. The GB model was associated with the largest reduction in LVC (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97). Conclusion: By itself A&F did not clearly contribute to the decline of the proportion of LVC; combined with volumeconstraining financial incentives, it was associated with larger reductions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weerdt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: