This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this research, the seismic performance of a proposed efficient energy dissipating steel-braced frame (EEDBF) in relation to that of a moment-resisting frame (MRF) and chevron braced frame (CBF) is studied. The frame is intended to combine the advantages of MRF and CBF and eliminate most of the disadvantages pertinent to these frames. Nonlinear static pushover, time history, and damage analyses of the three frames are conducted to assess the performance of the EEDBF compared to that of MRF and CBF. The analyses results revealed that the EEDBF has a more stable lateral force-deformation behavior compared to CBF. The energy dissipation capacity of the EEDBF is comparable to that of the MRF. The drift of the EEDBF at small to medium intensity ground motions is comparable to that of the CBF and smaller than that of the MRF. At high intensity ground motions, the drift of the EEDBF is smaller than those of both CBF and MRF. Furthermore, the EEDBF is found to experience less damage compared to other frames.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dicleli et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: