Key result
Inpatient WCD use facilitates functional independence and uninterrupted care in a CAD patient.
Why the study?
There are no rehabilitation guidelines for patients wearing a wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) despite its increasing use for interim protection before internal cardiac defibrillator implantation.
Case Report (n=1)
This case report illustrates that with knowledgeable clinicians and appropriate safety measures, patients wearing a wearable cardioverter defibrillator can successfully and safely participate in inpatient rehabilitation.
Case report of physical therapy with WCD use supports feasibility; leaves open need for guidelines and prospective trials.
Background and Purpose: Sudden cardiac death causes an estimated 200,000 to 450,000 deaths per year in the USA. Although permanent implantation of an internal cardiac defibrillator offers a preventive intervention, the required assessment period for determining need creates vulnerability for patients who will benefit from this protection. The use of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) for interim protection is rapidly increasing. There are no rehabilitation guidelines for patients wearing a WCD. This article reviews the WCD's purpose, considers implications and current challenges for use during rehabilitation, and illustrates this with a case report. Case Description: A 51-year-old male with coronary artery disease following prolonged hospitalization was fitted with a WCD during evaluation for an internal cardiac defibrillator. During inpatient rehabilitation, the therapy plan required unique considerations because of the presence of the WCD. Outcomes: Recapitulating the patient's rehabilitation course illustrates the WCD's challenges, the benefits to exercise progression, and the safety measures used. The patient gained functional independence, with uninterrupted care, in the presence of the WCD. Discussion: Knowledgeable clinicians, attention to safety, and sufficient patient/caregiver education are essential for uninterrupted and successful rehabilitative care for WCD-wearing patients. Because of increasing clinical prevalence of WCDs in rehabilitation, it is critically important to share clinical experience and eventually conduct a systematic assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perillo et al. (2018) conducted a case report in Coronary artery disease (n=1). Wearable cardioverter defibrillator was evaluated on Functional independence and uninterrupted care. Inpatient rehabilitation with a wearable cardioverter defibrillator allowed a 51-year-old male with coronary artery disease to gain functional independence with uninterrupted care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: