Fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) from large-scale retail is an abundant, relatively homogeneous feedstock for black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae, an alternative to composting. This study assessed, by life cycle assessment (LCA), the environmental performance of a pilot plant producing 15-day-old larvae as animal protein and tested whether the additive conditioning of the FVW changes that performance. Three substrates were compared (FVW with 20% bakery waste, 20% bran, and 2% sawdust, respectively) using climate change (GWP100a, IPCC 2007), economic allocation, Monte Carlo simulation, and transport distance sensitivity. The scenario ranking depended on the functional unit: per Mg of waste, the sawdust substrate was lowest (39.75 kg CO2eq), whereas, per kg of protein, the bran substrate was best (8.87 kg CO2eq, ~66% below bakery waste). Electricity, additive, and starter diet dominated the footprint. The conditioning additive, not the waste itself, governed sustainability; the bran–bakery waste difference was statistically discernible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suardi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: