Key result
Special endurance training increases 30-second bandal chagi kicks by ~15% versus traditional training.
Why the study?
The dynamics of special endurance indicators in taekwondo players aged 12-14 under the influence of a proposed methodology were investigated due to a need to assess its effectiveness.
RCT (n=30)
No
Mean Difference: 4.74
Absolute Event Rate: 36.87% vs 32.13%
p-value: p=≤0.05
The proposed methodology significantly improves special endurance indicators in 12-14 year old taekwondo players.
May improve kick endurance in young taekwondo athletes; hypothesis-generating and requires larger trials before practice change.
Purpose: to investigate the dynamics of special endurance indicators under the influence of the proposed methodology. Material and methods. The research used the following research methods: theoretical analysis and generalization of scientific and methodological literature and the Internet, pedagogical testing, pedagogical experiment, methods of mathematical statistics. Results. When performing the bandal chagi kick in the first test, the difference between the arithmetic means before and after the experiment was 4,74 hits, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 7,64 % in the experimental group. In the second test, the difference in arithmetic means was 3,54 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 3,19 % in the experimental group. In the third test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 10,66 strokes, the coefficient of variation decreased by 6,48 %. In the fourth test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 9,14 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 6,49 %. In the fifth test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 12,8 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 7,48 %. When performing a dolyo chagi kick in the first test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 8,46 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 8,48 %. In the second test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 9,67 strokes in the experimental group before and after the experiment, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 4,61 %. In the third test, the arithmetic mean increased by 9,86 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 4,82 %. In the fourth test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 10,34 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 6,01 %. In the fifth test, the arithmetic mean difference was 9,74 strokes in the experimental group after the experiment, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 6,55 %. When performing a nerio chagi kick in the first test, the difference between the arithmetic averages before and after the experiment was 8,53 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 5,12 %. In the second test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 8 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 7,21 %. In the third test, the difference in arithmetic means was 7,93 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 6,33 %. In the fourth test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 7,27 strokes, the coefficient of variation decreased by 4,88 %. In the fifth test, the difference in arithmetic averages was 8,6 strokes, and the coefficient of variation decreased by 5,18 %. Conclusions. The technique proposed by us has a positive effect on the development of special endurance of taekwondo players aged 12–14. This is evidenced by the results obtained at the end of the experiment. Thus, taekwondo players of the experimental group have significantly higher indicators of the development of special endurance in all tests (p≤0,05).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O. Palii (2023) conducted an RCT in Taekwondo players (n=30). Special endurance training methodology vs. Traditional training program was evaluated on Number of bandal chagi kicks in 30 seconds (left stance, back leg) (MD 4.74, p=≤0.05). The proposed special endurance training methodology significantly increased the number of bandal chagi kicks performed in 30 seconds compared to traditional training (36.87 vs 32.13 kicks, p≤0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: