Key result
Low LA strain predicts ~54% greater risk of AF recurrence post-ablation in moderately enlarged atria.
Why the study?
AF recurrence after catheter ablation is higher in patients with a large left atrium, and the incremental prognostic value of pre-procedural LA strain in patients with moderately enlarged LA is unclear.
Does low pre-procedural left atrial strain predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with moderately enlarged left atria?
Cohort (n=2,269)
Does low pre-procedural left atrial strain predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with moderately enlarged left atria?
Hazard Ratio: 1.539 (95% CI 1.13–2.094)
p-value: p=0.006
Pre-procedural left atrial strain provides incremental prognostic value for predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with moderately enlarged left atria.
May refine AF recurrence risk stratification after ablation in moderately enlarged atria; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) is an effective rhythm control method for patients with AF, but AF recurrence is higher in patients with a large left atrium (LA). We explored whether pre-procedural LA strain has incremental prognostic value for the long-term rhythm outcomes of AFCA in patients with AF and moderately enlarged LA size (45≤LA diameter<50mm). Methods We included 2,269 patients who underwent de novo AF catheter ablation (men 72.2%, 59.1[±10.7] years, paroxysmal AF 64.0%). We divided grouped into 5 mm increments and determined the appropriate cut-off of LA diameter (45mm) predicting the difference in long-term rhythm outcome by the log-likelihood values of multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Patients with moderately enlarged LA size (45≤LA diameter<50mm, n=413) with borderline rhythm outcomes were used for analysis. Results In the cohort of 413 patients who underwent AFCA with moderately enlarged LA size, AF was recurred in 208 patients (43.7%) after AFCA. We determined the appropriate cut-off of LA strain (12.5) predicting the difference in long-term rhythm outcome by the log-likelihood values of multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. During 24 months [10-50] follow-up, patients with low LA strain (<12.5) were showed worsen rhythm outcome than high LA strain (Log-rank p<0.001). Patients with AF recurrence after AFCA were independently associated with low LA strain (HR 1.539 [1.130-2.094], p=0.006), and paroxysmal AF (OR 0.651 [0.469-0.905], p=0.011). Furthermore, the likelihood ratio test demonstrated a significant influence of adding LA strain by TTE (χ2 = 13.90 [P < 0.001]). Conclusions LA strain using baseline echocardiography has a predictive power for AF recurrence after AFCA in patients with moderately enlarged LA size (45≤LA diameter<50mm).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=2,269). Low left atrial strain (<12.5) vs. High left atrial strain (≥12.5) was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence (HR 1.539, 95% CI 1.130-2.094, p=0.006). Low left atrial strain (<12.5) independently predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with moderately enlarged left atria (HR 1.539; 95% CI 1.130-2.094; p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: