Key result
Transesophageal VA interval ≤80 ms accurately differentiates AVNRT from AVRT/EAT in PSVT with normal ECG.
Why the study?
The diagnostic accuracy of the transesophageal ventriculo-atrial interval in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and normal baseline ECG was not established.
Does the transesophageal ventriculo-atrial interval accurately diagnose the mechanism of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in patients with a normal baseline ECG?
Observational (n=318)
Does the transesophageal ventriculo-atrial interval accurately diagnose the mechanism of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in patients with a normal baseline ECG?
A transesophageal VA interval of ≤80 ms has high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating AVNRT from AVRT/EAT in patients with PSVT and a normal baseline ECG.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the diagnostic accuracy of the transesophageal ventriculo-atrial (VA) interval in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and normal baseline electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: The transesophageal VA interval during tachycardia was recorded in 318 patients (age 45 ± 17 years, 58% female) with PSVT and a normal surface ECG between attacks. Subsequently, all patients underwent an ablation procedure establishing the correct tachycardia diagnosis. RESULTS: AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), AV reentrant tachycardia through a concealed accessory pathway (AVRT), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) were found in 213, 95, and 10 cases, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified an optimal cutoff for a binary categorization of AVNRT versus AVRT/EAT at ≤80 ms (area under the curve 0.891). Owing to a biphasic distribution, AVNRT was very likely at VA intervals ≤90 ms with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 87%, 91%, and 95%. In the range 91-160 ms the corresponding values for AVRT were 88%, 95%, and 88% (90%, 99%, and 98% in male patients). In the small group with VA intervals >160 ms (n = 29), the diagnosis was less clear (PPV of 67% for AVNRT). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sudden onset regular tachycardia and a normal ECG during sinus rhythm, a transesophageal VA interval of ≤80 ms has the highest diagnostic accuracy to diagnose AVNRT versus AVRT/EAT. Overall, the biphasic distribution of VA intervals suggests considering AVNRT at 90 ms and below and AVRT between 91 and 160 ms (in particular in male patients) while the diagnosis is vague at VA intervals above 160 ms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braunschweig et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) with normal baseline ECG (n=318). Transesophageal ventriculo-atrial (VA) interval vs. Ablation procedure (gold standard diagnosis) was evaluated on Binary categorization of AVNRT versus AVRT/EAT (AUC 0.891). A transesophageal ventriculo-atrial interval of ≤80 ms accurately differentiated AVNRT from AVRT/EAT (AUC 0.891) in patients with PSVT and normal baseline ECG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: