Key result
Negative SA-VA interval during overdrive pacing distinguishes atrial tachycardia from long-RP SVTs with 100% accuracy.
Why the study?
The diagnostic usefulness of the SA minus VA interval had not yet been evaluated in non-entrainable long VA SVTs that terminate with overdrive pacing.
Does a negative SA-VA interval during overdrive ventricular pacing differentiate atrial tachycardia from other long RP SVTs when pacing terminates the tachycardia?
Observational (n=172)
Yes
Does a negative SA-VA interval during overdrive ventricular pacing differentiate atrial tachycardia from other long RP SVTs when pacing terminates the tachycardia?
A negative SA-VA interval during overdrive ventricular pacing that terminates a long-RP SVT reliably differentiates atrial tachycardia from other SVTs, providing diagnostic value when post-entrainment response cannot be evaluated.
Negative SA–VA may identify AT in non-entrainable long-VA SVTs; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Introduction and objective We have recently reported that the stimulus–atrial interval during ventricular entrainment (SA) minus the ventriculo–atrial (VA) interval during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is negative in 100% of atrial tachycardias (AT) with ventriculoatrial conduction and positive in 100% of the remaining SVTs. This finding could be of particular practical interest in "non-entrainable" SVTs with a long VA interval, where overdrive pacing consistently terminates the tachycardia, making post-entrainment response impossible to assess. However, its usefulness in this setting has not yet been evaluated. Methods Long VA SVTs that terminated with right apical ventricular (RVA) overdrive pacing after modifying the AA interval were retrospectively and consecutively collected from two centers. Long VA SVT was defined by a VA interval ≥50% of the R–R or V-V Interval. Intervals were measured from the QRS onset to the earliest septal atrial electrogram. The SA interval was measured on the first beat of the pacing train that modified the timing of the atrial electrogram. The final diagnosis [AT, atrioventricular nodal reentry (AVNRT), AV reentry (AVRT)] was established using standard electrophysiological criteria. The optimal SA–VA cutoff value for the diagnosis of AT was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results Among 172 long RP SVTs analyzed, RVA overdrive pacing successfully modified the AA interval and terminated the tachycardia in 20 cases: 4 (20%) AVNRT, 4 (20%) AVRT, and 12 (60%) AT. As shown in Table 1, AT had longer cycle lengths (416 ± 67 ms vs. 343 ± 38 ms; p=0.009), longer VA intervals (286 ± 74 ms vs. 209 ± 49 ms : p=0.025), and shorter SA intervals (169 ± 43 vs. 270 ± 60; p =0.003] although with some overlap between groups. In contrast, all ATs exhibited a negative SA–VA interval (−117 ± 91 ms), whereas all the remaining SVTs had positive SA–VA values (61 ± 35 ms); p < 0.001. A cutoff value of SA–VA < 0 ms provided an area under the curve of 1.0 for the diagnosis of AT. Conclusion In long-RP SVTs where overdrive ventricular pacing modifies the AA interval and terminates the tachycardia, a negative SA–VA interval reliably differentiates AT from other forms of SVT. This criterion may therefore provide additional diagnostic value in this uncommon and challenging subgroup of SVTs, in which the post-entrainment response cannot be evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pascual et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Long RP supraventricular tachycardias (n=172). Negative SA-VA interval vs. Positive SA-VA interval was evaluated on Diagnosis of atrial tachycardia (AUC 1.0, p=<0.001). A negative SA-VA interval perfectly differentiated atrial tachycardia from other forms of long-RP SVT terminated by overdrive ventricular pacing (AUC 1.0, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: