Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Trials made near Cambridge in 1949 and 1950, under ‘mild’ and ‘hard’ spring weather conditions respectively, have confirmed that the findings of Aberg & Denward in Sweden, and of Pedersen, Andersen & Hermansen in Denmark, concerning distortions in barley caused by MCPA and 2,4-D, are also valid under English conditions. 2. Damage to barley caused by the application of MCPA and 2,4-D up to the 2-leaf and early 3-leaf stages may be recognized by the occurrence of many tubular leaves and bowed or trapped ears. As little as 2 lb./acre of 2,4-D, as the amine salt, applied at this stage may also cause severe stunting of theplants with distortion of the roots. 3. Damage to barley by the application of MCPA and 2,4-D at the 3–4-leaf stages may be recognized by the occurrence of tweaked ears. The application of as little as 2 lb./acre of MCPA, as the sodium salt, at these stages may cause tweaking in over 50% of the ears. 2,4-D (as amine) at the same dosage causes more distortion. Although the reduction in yield due to such tweaking may be slight, the grain sample is irregular in size, with a number of naked grains, and malting quality may be reduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Large et al. (1951) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: