Key result
Combining clinical risk factors and CACS identifies kidney transplant candidates with ~2% annual MACE risk.
Why the study?
Current guidelines recommend coronary artery disease screening in kidney transplantation candidates, but the prognostic value of various cardiac imaging modalities remains uncertain.
Do CACS, coronary CTA, SPECT, and ICA predict MACE and all-cause mortality in kidney transplantation candidates?
Cohort (n=154)
Do CACS, coronary CTA, SPECT, and ICA predict MACE and all-cause mortality in kidney transplantation candidates?
CACS and coronary CTA are superior to SPECT and traditional risk factors for risk stratification in kidney transplant candidates.
May support deferring further testing in low-risk kidney transplant candidates; leaves open prospective validation of CACS-guided strategies.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform a prospective head-to-head comparison of the predictive value of clinical risk factors and a variety of cardiac imaging modalities including coronary artery calcium score (CACS), coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in kidney transplantation candidates. BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend screening for coronary artery disease in kidney transplantation candidates. Furthermore, noninvasive stress imaging is recommended in current guidelines, despite its low diagnostic accuracy and uncertain prognostic value. METHODS: The study prospectively evaluated 154 patients referred for kidney transplantation. All patients underwent CACS, coronary CTA, SPECT, and ICA testing. The clinical endpoints were extracted from patients' interviews, patients' records, and registries. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 3.7 years. In total, 27 (17.5%) patients experienced MACE, and 31 (20.1%) patients died during follow-up. In a time-to-event analysis, both risk factors and CACS significantly predicted death, but only CACS predicted MACE. Combining risk factors with CACS identified a very-low-risk cohort with a MACE event rate of 2.1%, and a 1.0% mortality rate per year. Of the diagnostic modalities, coronary CTA and ICA significantly predicted MACE, but only coronary CTA predicted death. In contrast, SPECT predicted neither MACE nor death. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with traditional risk factors and other cardiac imaging modalities, CACS and coronary CTA seem superior for risk stratification in kidney transplant candidates. Applying a combination of risk factors and CACS and subsequently coronary CTA seems to be the most appropriate strategy. (Angiographic CT of Renal Transplantation Candidate Study [ACToR]; NCT01344434).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winther et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Kidney transplantation candidates (n=154). Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and coronary CTA vs. SPECT and invasive coronary angiography was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Combining clinical risk factors with coronary artery calcium score identified a very-low-risk cohort of kidney transplant candidates with a MACE event rate of 2.1% and a 1.0% mortality rate per year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: