Key result
Heat-stable rotavirus vaccine elicits an IgA response in ~88% of infants, matching RotaTeq.
Why the study?
The safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a heat-stable rotavirus vaccine in healthy adults and infants required evaluation.
Does a heat-stable rotavirus vaccine demonstrate safety and immunogenicity compared to placebo or active comparator in healthy adults and infants?
RCT (n=100)
Blinded (adults) and open-label (infants)
1:1 ratio
No
Does a heat-stable rotavirus vaccine demonstrate safety and immunogenicity compared to placebo or active comparator in healthy adults and infants?
Absolute Event Rate: 88% vs 84%
A heat-stable rotavirus vaccine was well-tolerated in adults and infants and demonstrated comparable immunogenicity to RotaTeq in infants.
HSRV appears safe and immunogenic in infants; extends Phase I/II data on heat-stable formulations but requires larger efficacy trials before practice change.
Objectives: To assess the safety and reactogenicity of single oral dose of heat-stable rotavirus vaccine (HSRV) in healthy adults aged 18–45 years followed by assessment of safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of three doses of HSRV in healthy infants aged 6–8 weeks at enrollment.Trial Design: Single-center randomized controlled, sequential, blinded (adults) and open-label (infants).Setting: Single site at International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b).Participants: Fifty eligible adults randomized in 1:1 ratio (HSRV: Placebo) followed by 50 eligible infants randomized in 1:1 ratio (HSRV: Comparator (RotaTeq®, pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant live-attenuated, rotavirus vaccine)).Intervention: Adults received either a single dose of HSRV or placebo and followed for 14 days. Infants received three doses of either HSRV or comparator with a follow-up for 28 days after each dose.Main Outcome Measures: Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) along with any serious adverse events (SAEs) were part of the safety and reactogenicity assessment in adults and infants whereas serum anti-rotavirus IgA response rates were part of immunogenicity assessment in infants only. Post-vaccination fecal shedding of vaccine-virus rotavirus strains was also determined in adults and infants.Results: In this study, HSRV, when compared with placebo, did not result in increase in solicited adverse events (solicited AEs) in adults. In infants, HSRV had a safety profile similar to comparator vis-à-vis solicited AEs. In infants, fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains was not detected in HSRV recipients but was observed in two comparator recipients. Percentage of infants exhibiting threefold rise in serum anti-rotavirus IgA titers from baseline to 1-month post-dose 3 in HSRV group was 88% (22/25) and 84% (21/25) in comparator group.Conclusion: HSRV was found to be generally well-tolerated in both adults and infants and immunogenic in infants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanchan et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=100). Heat-stable rotavirus vaccine (HSRV) vs. Placebo (adults); RotaTeq (infants) was evaluated on Threefold rise in serum anti-rotavirus IgA titers from baseline to 1-month post-dose 3 (infants). Heat-stable rotavirus vaccine was well-tolerated and elicited a threefold rise in serum anti-rotavirus IgA titers in 88% of infants compared to 84% with RotaTeq.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: