Key result
Complete local excision effectively resolves rare intravenous pyogenic granuloma of the ocular adnexa.
Why the study?
Intravenous pyogenic granuloma of the ocular adnexa is a recently described lesion with few reported cases and unclear histogenesis.
Case Report (n=4)
Intravenous pyogenic granuloma of the ocular adnexa is a rare benign lesion that can be differentiated from other intravascular fibroangiomatous proliferations and is treated with complete local excision.
Recognition of intravenous pyogenic granuloma may refine the differential for ocular adnexal vascular lesions; extends sparse case literature but leaves open incidence and management.
Intravenous pyogenic granuloma is a recently described form of pyogenic granuloma (PG) in which the angiomatous proliferation is confined entirely within the lumen of a vein. To our knowledge, only four cases involving the ocular adnexa, including two that we encountered, have been described. Histologically, this benign lesion is similar to PG of other locations and is characterized by lobular congeries of capillaries embedded in a fibromyxoid matrix containing scattered chronic inflammatory cells. The whole lesion appears as a single polypoid mass projecting into the lumen of a dilated vein. The histogenesis of this lesion remains obscure. Complete local excision is the treatment of choice. Intravenous PG can be differentiated from other intravascular fibroangiomatous proliferations, including intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia, intravenous atypical vascular proliferation, intravascular fasciitis, and organized thrombus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luan D. Truong (1985) conducted a case report in Intravenous pyogenic granuloma of the ocular adnexa (n=4). Intravenous pyogenic granuloma was evaluated. Based on 4 described cases, intravenous pyogenic granuloma of the ocular adnexa is a rare benign intravascular angiomatous proliferation for which complete local excision is the treatment of choice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: