Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We propose a new deductive model checking methodology where narrowing-based logical model checking of symbolic states specified as disjunctions of constrained patterns is combined with inductive theorem proving to discharge inductive verification conditions that ensure useful symbolic state space reductions. An obvious combination is to use an inductive theorem prover in automated mode as an oracle to help logical model checking reach a fixpoint. But this is not the only possible combination. In this paper we focus instead on a new deductive model checking methodology to verify invariants —including inductive invariants— of infinite-state systems, where logical model checking automates large parts of the verification effort with the help of an inductive theorem prover as an oracle . Inductive verification conditions not discharged automatically by the oracle are dealt with by commands that refine some constrained patterns by useful semantic equivalences, and by using an inductive theorem prover in interactive mode. This methodology is demonstrated by means of concurrent system examples using two Maude tools working in tandem: the DM-Check narrowing-based symbolic model checker, and the NuITP inductive theorem prover.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bae et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: