Key result
Review highlights the need for reliable autonomic testing to guide surgical sympathectomy in essential hypertension.
Why the study?
Selection of patients for surgical sympathectomy in essential hypertension is difficult due to lack of accurate methods to quantify autonomic nervous system activity.
The text highlights the historical challenge of selecting hypertensive patients for surgical sympathectomy due to the lack of accurate methods to quantify autonomic activity.
Lack of reliable autonomic testing limits sympathectomy selection in essential hypertension; leaves open validation of modern quantification methods.
The demonstration that surgical sympathectomy may favorably influence the course of essential hypertension in man has given emphasis to the role of the autonomic nervous system in the pathogenesis of this disease. Indeed there is much to indicate that (1) neurogenic vasoconstriction is of prime importance in human hypertension and that (2) renal ischemia is a secondary rather than a fundamental phenomenon in its mediation. Obviously, sympathectomy can be successful only in those instances in which vasospasm is due wholly or in large part to neurogenic influences. As there has been no method by which automomic activity could be accurately quantified in man, selection of patients for surgery has proved difficult. A test that could determine the presence and degree of participation of a neurogenic element would be valuable. The sodium amytal, sodium nitrite and cold pressor tests, although still widely used, have given ample demonstration of their inability to
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry I. Russek (1946) studied essential hypertension. surgical sympathectomy was evaluated. The abstract discusses the need for a reliable test to quantify autonomic activity in patients with essential hypertension to better select candidates for surgical sympathectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: