Why the study?
It was unclear whether more recent cohorts of the oldest-old receive more active hospital treatment and whether this leads to higher in-hospital and post-operative mortality.
Does being in a more recent birth cohort (1905 vs 1895) result in more active hospital treatment and affect in-hospital and post-operative mortality among the oldest-old (ages 85-99)?
Cohort (n=27,803)
Yes
Does being in a more recent birth cohort (1905 vs 1895) result in more active hospital treatment and affect in-hospital and post-operative mortality among the oldest-old (ages 85-99)?
More recent cohorts of the oldest-old receive more active hospital and surgical treatment without an increase in post-operative or in-hospital mortality, suggesting appropriate patient selection based on health status rather than chronological age.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports active care in selected oldest-old; hypothesis-generating for age-independent selection criteria in future cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: to examine whether the Danish 1905 cohort members had more active hospital treatment than the 1895 cohort members from ages 85 to 99 years and whether it results in higher in-hospital and post-operative mortality. METHODS: in the present register-based follow-up study the complete Danish birth cohorts born in 1895 (n = 12,326) and 1905 (n = 15,477) alive and residing in Denmark at the age of 85 were followed from ages 85 to 99 years with regard to hospitalisations and all-cause and cause-specific surgical procedures, as well as in-hospital and post-operative mortality. RESULTS: the 1905 cohort members had more frequent hospital admissions and operations, but they had a shorter length of hospital stay than the 1895 cohort at all ages from 85 to 99 years. The increase in primary prosthetic replacements of hip joint was observed even within the 1895 cohort: no patients were operated at ages 85-89 years versus 2.2-3.6% at ages 95-99 years. Despite increased hospitalisation and operation rates, there was no increase in post-operative and in-hospital mortality rates in the 1905 cohort. These patterns were similar among men and women. CONCLUSIONS: the observed patterns are compatible with more active treatment of the recent cohorts of old-aged persons and reduced age inequalities in the Danish healthcare system. No increase in post-operative mortality suggests that the selection of older patients eligible for a surgical treatment is likely to be based on the health status of old-aged persons and the safety of surgical procedures rather than chronological age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oksuzyan et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Oldest-old adults (n=27,803). 1905 birth cohort vs. 1895 birth cohort was evaluated on Hospitalisations, surgical procedures, and in-hospital and post-operative mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: