Key result
INK4A deletion is linked to ~6-fold higher risk of disease-specific death in Ewing sarcoma.
Why the study?
Secondary genetic alterations involved in progression of Ewing sarcoma are not well understood, and the prognostic significance of INK4A deletion requires confirmation.
Does INK4A deletion impact disease specific survival in patients with Ewing sarcoma?
Observational (n=39)
Does INK4A deletion impact disease specific survival in patients with Ewing sarcoma?
Relative Risk: 6
p-value: p=0.001
INK4A deletion is a frequent secondary molecular genetic alteration in Ewing sarcoma and is associated with poor disease-specific survival.
INK4A deletion may worsen Ewing sarcoma prognosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding therapy.
BACKGROUND: The primary genetic alteration in > 95% of Ewing sarcomas (ES) is a specific fusion of EWS with FLI1 or ERG. Secondary genetic alterations possibly involved in progression of ES are not well understood. A recent study found loss of the negative cell cycle regulator gene INK4A in 8 of 27 ES samples (30%). To confirm these findings and evaluate their prognostic significance, the authors studied INK4A deletion in 41 ES samples from 39 patients. METHODS: Using Southern blot analysis with an INK4A p16 cDNA probe, the intensity of the INK4A bands in ES DNA samples was normalized to that of a control probe and compared with nondeleted control DNA; > 50% signal reduction was scored as evidence of deletion. All ES tumor DNA samples previously were confirmed to have EWS rearrangements on the same Southern blots, using a cDNA probe spanning the EWS breakpoint region. RESULTS: Tumors from 7 patients (18%) showed INK4A deletion independent of disease stage (localized or metastatic) or sample source (primary tumor or metastasis). INK4A was a strong negative factor for disease specific survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.001) and in multivariate analysis including stage (relative risk = 6; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: INK4A deletions appear to be the most frequent secondary molecular genetic alteration found to date in ES. Their possible clinical usefulness in identifying a subset of ES patients with poor prognosis merits systematic prospective analysis. [See related article on pages 783-92.]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Ewing sarcoma (n=39). INK4A deletion vs. No INK4A deletion was evaluated on disease specific survival (RR 6, p=0.001). INK4A deletion was present in 18% of Ewing sarcoma patients and was a strong negative prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (relative risk = 6; P = 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: