Key result
TAVI patients have ~90% higher odds of unilateral carotid stenosis ≥50% than coronary angiography patients.
Why the study?
Little is known about the prevalence and clinical significance of carotid artery stenosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Cohort (n=171)
Odds Ratio: 1.9
Absolute Event Rate: 33% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.001
The prevalence of carotid artery stenosis in patients undergoing TAVI is high (33%), exceeding that observed in patients undergoing catheterization for coronary indications, though it was not independently associated with 30-day mortality or stroke.
Carotid stenosis prevalence is higher in TAVI patients; leaves open whether routine screening improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to analyze the prevalence and predictors of Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: CAS is associated with the risk of periprocedural stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, little is known about the prevalence of and clinical significance of CAS in the setting of TAVI. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing a carotid Doppler study the day before TAVI were followed prospectively. CAS was defined in accordance with current practice guidelines. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent correlates of CAS. RESULTS: The study included 171 patients (age 82 ± 6, male gender 47%). Carotid atherosclerosis (CA, defined as any carotid plaque) was present in 164 (96%) of patients, and CAS (peak systolic velocity [PSV] ≥ 125 cm/sec; ≥50% diameter stenosis) in 57 (33%) patients. Severe CAS (PSV ≥ 230 cm/sec; ≥70% stenosis, or near occlusion) was found in 15 (9%) patients. By multivariate analysis, smoking and a higher Euroscore independently predicted the presence of CAS. Patients in the present TAVI cohort had a significantly higher prevalence of both unilateral and bilateral CAS ≥ 50% than those in a previously reported cohort (n = 494 patients, age ≥ 70) undergoing clinically driven coronary angiography (33% vs. 20%, OR = 1.9, P = 0.001; and, 13% vs. 6%, OR = 2.3, P = 0.003, respectively). CAS was not independently associated with 30-day mortality or stroke rates. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CAS in patients undergoing TAVI is high, exceeding that observed in patients undergoing catheterization for coronary indications. The impact of CAS on clinical outcomes following TAVI merits further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steinvil et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=171). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Clinically driven coronary angiography was evaluated on Prevalence of unilateral carotid artery stenosis ≥ 50% (OR 1.9, p=0.001). Patients undergoing TAVI had a significantly higher prevalence of unilateral carotid artery stenosis ≥50% compared to those undergoing coronary angiography (33% vs. 20%; OR 1.9; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: