The extensive use of chemical flame retardants to meet the California Furniture Flammability Standard Technical Bulletin 117 (TB117) [1] provides an example of the need for consideration of environmental impacts of fire safety interventions before they are implemented.Flame retardants are currently being used in products with high levels of human exposure without adequate toxicological testing.For example, flame retardants commercially used to meet TB117 have been found to have negative impacts upon human, animal, and environmental health [2] and notably, the TB117 standard has not been shown to have a measurable fire safety benefit.Both the unintended adverse impacts and the lack of fire safety benefits of California TB117 are discussed in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babrauskas et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: