Key result
Layered mitigation protocols linked to a ~0.6% SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in a controlled environment.
Why the study?
Data are lacking regarding the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during large indoor sporting events involving fans in a controlled environment.
Does a layered mitigation strategy including a controlled environment and daily testing prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in large indoor sporting events?
Cohort (n=2,660)
Does a layered mitigation strategy including a controlled environment and daily testing prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in large indoor sporting events?
A layered mitigation strategy including a controlled environment, daily testing, and masking successfully limited SARS-CoV-2 transmission during a large indoor sporting event.
Low transmission detected in this controlled NCAA event supports mitigation protocols; leaves open generalizability to other settings or variants.
BACKGROUND: Data are lacking regarding the risk of viral SARS-CoV-2 transmission during a large indoor sporting event involving fans utilizing a controlled environment. We sought to describe case characteristics, mitigation protocols used, variants detected, and secondary infections detected during the 2021 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Men's Basketball Tournament involving collegiate athletes from across the U.S. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data collected from March 16 to April 3, 2021, as part of a closed environment which required daily reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, social distancing, universal masking, and limited contact between tiers of participants. Nearly 3000 players, staff, and vendors participated in indoor, unmasked activities that involved direct exposure between cases and noninfected individuals. The main outcome of interest was transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus, as measured by the number of new infections and variant(s) detected among positive cases. Secondary infections were identified through contact tracing by public health officials. RESULTS: Out of 2660 participants, 15 individuals (0.56%) screened positive for SARS-CoV-2. Four cases involved players or officials, and all cases were detected before any individual played in or officiated a game. Secondary transmissions all occurred outside the controlled environment. Among those disqualified from the tournament (4 cases; 26.7%), all individuals tested positive for the Iota variant (B.1.526). All other cases involved the Alpha variant (B.1.1.7). Nearly all teams (N = 58; 85.3%) reported that some individuals had received at least one dose of a vaccine. Overall, 17.9% of participants either had at least one dose of the vaccine or possessed documented infection within 90 days of the tournament. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study of the 2021 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament closed environment, only a few cases were detected, and they were discovered in advance of potential exposure. These findings support the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for large indoor sporting events during the COVID-19 pandemic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dixon et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in COVID-19 (n=2,660). Controlled environment with COVID-19 mitigation protocols was evaluated on Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus (number of new infections). A controlled environment with rigorous mitigation protocols during the 2021 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament resulted in only 15 positive cases (0.56%) among 2,660 participants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from BMC Public Health