Key result
Cutaneous CO2 loading increases garter snake ventilation ~3.5-fold via vagal pathways without changing arterial PCO2.
Why the study?
The mechanisms by which venous CO2 influences ventilation in garter snakes, including the role of vagal neurons, were not fully understood.
Does venous CO2 loading via the skin affect ventilation in garter snakes?
Does venous CO2 loading via the skin affect ventilation in garter snakes?
Effect estimate: 3.5-fold increase
In garter snakes, ventilation increases in proportion to venous CO2 load without being driven by arterial hypercapnia, a response mediated by vagal nerve receptors.
Garter snakes were used to study the effects of venous CO2 loading using the skin as an exchanger. The gaseous environment surrounding the snake's body was isolated by placing the body in a plethysmograph with the head out. While the animal breathed room air, the carbon dioxide concentration within the plethysmograph was varied between 0 and 80%. Room air was drawn through a funnel placed over the snake's head, thus collecting the exhaled gases, and this gas was analyzed by O2 and CO2 analyzers. The descending aorta was cannulated to measure blood gases. Expired CO2 flow rose linearly with increasing cutaneous CO2. Ventilation increased 3.5-fold at 80% cutaneous CO2 compared with no cutaneous CO2 load. Neither the mean CO2 concentration in exhaled air nor arterial PCO2 changed when the snake was exposed to high levels of CO2 at the skin. Thus ventilation increased in proportion to the CO2 load, and was not driven by arterial hypercapnia. Bilateral vagotomy eliminated arterial CO2 homeostasis during cutaneous CO2 loading, and ventilation increased with increasing arterial PCO2. Therefore, these snakes respond to extra-arterial elevations in CO2 or to a changing CO2 signal. Furthermore, receptors responsible for the increase in ventilation when venous CO2 is elevated have neurons in the vagus nerves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furilla et al. (1991) studied this question. Venous CO2 loading via skin vs. 0% CO2 (room air) was evaluated on Ventilation (3.5-fold increase). Cutaneous CO2 loading up to 80% increased ventilation 3.5-fold in garter snakes without changing arterial PCO2, an effect eliminated by bilateral vagotomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: