Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Mesh-related infection after open ventral hernia repair is a clinical dilemma in abdominal wall hernia surgery, especially in the bacterial resistance era. The management of such a problem usually needs complete mesh excision, which results in a high recurrence rate.Objective: The goals of the current study were to evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy [NPWT] in infected mesh preservation.Patients and Methods: This prospective study was carried out from January 2017 to December 2019. A total of twenty-four cases with mesh exposure after ventral hernia repair was involved in our study. Patients were categorized into two comparable groups, Group I: VAC was applied for the preservation of the infected mesh, Group II: conventional wound care dressing was used. Patients’ demographics, types of hernia, wound diameter, and the outcomes of each technique were recorded in the study.Results: Out of 24 patients there were 9 males and 15 females, the mean age was 42 years. Types of hernias were 15 paraumbilical hernias, 6 incisional hernias, and 3 recurrent hernias. The wound size in group I ranged from18 x 11 cm – 8.5 x 5 cm and in group II ranged from 16.5 x10 cm – 7 x 5. In Group I, the mesh salvage was accomplished in 11 cases [91.7%] and the wound closed with 2ndary suturing and only 1 [8.3%] patient need partial mesh excision. While In Group II, mesh salvage was accomplished in 5 cases [41.7%] however, 7 [58.3%] patients needed radical en-bloc mesh excision. All the cases had followed up for 6 months.Conclusion: NPWT/VAC therapy has excellent and promising outcomes in the preservation of infected prosthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoud Nagaty (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: