Key result
General anesthesia cuts post-operative ECG changes ~71% versus regional anesthesia in cardiac patients.
Why the study?
There are limited studies indicating the incidence of post-operative morbidity and mortality in high-risk cardiac patients undergoing urological surgeries.
Does general anesthesia compared to regional anesthesia affect the incidence of post-operative cardiovascular complications in patients with known cardiac risk undergoing urological surgeries?
RCT (n=40)
Double-blind
randomized
Does general anesthesia compared to regional anesthesia affect the incidence of post-operative cardiovascular complications in patients with known cardiac risk undergoing urological surgeries?
Absolute Event Rate: 10% vs 35%
There appears to be no significant difference in overall post-operative cardiovascular outcomes between regional and general anesthesia in cardiac patients undergoing urological procedures, despite some hemodynamic and ECG variations.
Favors general over regional anesthesia to limit post-op ECG changes in cardiac urological patients; extends RCT evidence guiding anesthesia selection.
Context: There are limited studies indicating the incideance of post operative morbidity and mortality in high risk patients. Urological procedures constitute a major portion of geriatric surgeries where a cardiac obligation is almost inevitable and selected for this study purpose.Aims: To compare the incidence of post operative cardiovascular complications during regional and general anesthetic techniques in patients with known cardiac risk undergoing urological surgeriesSettings and Design: Prospective randomized double blind study.Methods and Material: 40 patients aged above 50 years posted for elective urological surgeries were enrolled in the study after obtaining approval from hospital ethics committee and written informed consent from the patients. Patients were divided into two groups A& B. Group A (n=20) received general and group B (n=20) received regional anaesthesia (spinal/ Epidural). All the patients received standard premedication and their basal vitals( BP, HR, ECG pattern) were recorded. The same parameters were monitored in the post operative period at regular intervals.Statistical analysis used: Student T test is used to test the significance of stastical difference in the variables between the two groups.Results: The mean heart rate and the mean arterial blood pressure were increased (P<0.01) in the general anaesthesia group. Group A showed 10% incidence of ECG changes and group B showed 35% incidence of ECG changes. But the changes in the hemodynamics were not significant.Conclusions: There is no difference between regional anaesthesia and general anaesthesia regarding the post operative outcome after urological procedures with respective hemodynamic changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaik et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Known cardiac risk undergoing urological surgeries (n=40). General anaesthesia vs. Regional anaesthesia (spinal/Epidural) was evaluated on Post-operative ECG changes. General anaesthesia resulted in a 10% incidence of post-operative ECG changes compared to 35% with regional anaesthesia in cardiac patients undergoing urological procedures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: