Key result
Ischemic stroke and MI share 14 extracellular vesicle proteins but have distinct protein and miRNA profiles.
Why the study?
Extracellular vesicles may play a role in ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction, but similarities and differences in their circulating content between these diseases are not well characterized.
Do extracellular vesicle protein and microRNA profiles differ between patients with ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and healthy controls?
Observational (n=140)
Do extracellular vesicle protein and microRNA profiles differ between patients with ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and healthy controls?
Circulating extracellular vesicle protein and miRNA profiles exhibit both shared and distinct characteristics between ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction, highlighting their potential as disease-specific biomarkers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support EV profiles as disease-specific biomarkers for stroke versus MI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are involved in intercellular signalling through the transfer of molecules during physiological and pathological conditions, such as ischaemic disease. EVs might therefore play a role in ischaemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI). In the present study, we analysed the similarities and differences in the content of circulating EVs in patients with IS and MI. This prospective observational study enrolled 140 participants (81 patients with IS, 37 with MI and 22 healthy controls [HCs]). We analysed the protein and microRNA content from EVs using proteomics and reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and compared it between the groups. In the patients with IS and MI, we identified 14 common proteins. When comparing IS and MI, we found differences in the protein profiles (apolipoprotein B, alpha-2-macroglobulin, fibronectin). We also found lower levels of miR-340 and miR-424 and higher levels of miR-29b in the patients with IS and MI compared with the HCs. Lastly, we found higher miR-340 levels in IS than in MI. In conclusion, proteomic and miRNA analyses suggest a relationship between circulating EV content and the patient's disease state. Although IS and MI affect different organs (brain and heart) with distinct histological characteristics, certain EV proteins and miRNAs appear to participate in both diseases, while others are present only in patients with IS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otero‐Ortega et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction (n=140). Ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Protein and microRNA content from circulating extracellular vesicles. Ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction shared 14 common extracellular vesicle proteins, but exhibited differences in specific proteins and miRNAs compared to each other and healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: