Key result
Lactated Ringer's-based del Nido cardioplegia linked to ~24% lower day 1 Troponin T vs blood cardioplegia.
Why the study?
Unavailability of Plasma-Lyte A limits the use of traditional del Nido cardioplegia in many countries, necessitating evaluation of lactated Ringer's as an alternative base solution.
Does del Nido cardioplegia with a lactated Ringer's base improve myocardial preservation and clinical outcomes in adults undergoing cardiac surgery compared to standard blood cardioplegia?
Observational (n=89)
No
Does del Nido cardioplegia with a lactated Ringer's base improve myocardial preservation and clinical outcomes in adults undergoing cardiac surgery compared to standard blood cardioplegia?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.632% vs 0.827%
p-value: p=0.009
Using lactated Ringer's as a base solution for del Nido cardioplegia provides effective myocardial protection and may improve perioperative outcomes compared to standard blood cardioplegia.
Unavailability of Plasma-Lyte A precludes the utility of traditional del Nido cardioplegia in many countries. This observational study aimed to evaluate myocardial preservation and clinical outcomes when using lactated Ringer’s solution as the base solution for del Nido cardioplegia as compared with our institute’s standard blood cardioplegia strategy. Eighty-nine adult patients underwent cardiac surgery for acquired heart disease from February 2017 to November 2017 either with del Nido cardioplegia (n = 44) or blood cardioplegia (n = 45). Clinical data and outcomes were compared. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Troponin T release was lower in the del Nido group on postoperative day 1 (.632 [.437, .907] vs. .827 [.599, 1.388] ng/mL;p= .009) and day 2 (.363 [.250, .451] vs. .549 [.340, .897] ng/mL;p= .002). The del Nido group exhibited lower total volume of cardioplegia administered (1,075 [1,000, 1,250] vs. 3,400 [2,700, 3,750] mL;p< .0001), fewer doses (1.6 ± .7 vs. 4.6 ± 1.3;p< .0001), and a decreased incidence of ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross-clamp removal (9.09 vs. 31.11%;p= .01). The del Nido group had shorter intensive care unit stays (2 [1, 2] vs. 3 [2, 4] days;p< .0001), hospital stays (7 [6, 10] vs. 9 [7, 10] days;p= .0002), less vasopressor and inotropic support (1 [1, 1] vs. 1 [1, 2] days;p= .0001), and lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (25 vs. 46.7%;p= .033). No mortality occurred and clinical outcomes were similar. The use of traditional del Nido cardioplegia ingredients added to lactated Ringer’s as the base solution provided either similar or superior myocardial protection than our blood cardioplegia strategy depending on the outcome measure analyzed. The use of lactated Ringer’s as a base solution may be an option for centers that do not have access to Plasma-Lyte. Further investigation and follow-up are warranted after this observational study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kantathut et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acquired heart disease (n=89). del Nido cardioplegia with lactated Ringer's base solution vs. Blood cardioplegia was evaluated on Troponin T release on postoperative day 1 (ng/mL) (p=0.009). Del Nido cardioplegia with lactated Ringer's base solution was associated with lower Troponin T release on postoperative day 1 compared to blood cardioplegia (0.632 vs 0.827 ng/mL; p=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: