Editorial: Invisible hazards, lasting impact: airborne toxicants and systemic disease from environmental and occupational exposures

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

The experiences of United States (U.S.) military Veterans exposed to environmental toxicants illustrate these challenges particularly well. Environmental exposures have accompanied warfare throughout history, yet it has often taken decades for affected Veterans to receive recognition, healthcare services, and scientific explanations for their illnesses [7][8][9]. The delayed recognition of diseases associated with Agent Orange, Gulf War exposures, and burn pit exposures reflects not only the biological complexity of environmental toxicants, but also the limitations of fragmented scientific, healthcare, surveillance, and policy systems [10,11]. In this context, Veterans, firefighters, miners, disaster responders and healthcare workers serve as important sentinel populations for understanding environmental health risks more broadly, providing opportunities to investigate mechanisms of injury, disease latency, biomarkers of exposure, and long-term health outcomes [9,[12][13][14]. Lessons learned from these populations may ultimately inform responses to other emerging environmental threats, including wildfire smoke, industrial disasters, urban pollution, and climate-associated exposures [15]. Public trust, transparent communication, and community engagement are increasingly recognized as essential components of effective environmental surveillance and policy implementation.Taken together, the studies presented in this Research Topic support a new paradigm for environmental and occupational health research that prioritizes convergence science and integration across the physical, biological, clinical, and population sciences [3,16,17]. Advancing environmental health will require not only scientific discovery, but also new models of collaboration capable of transforming fragmented knowledge into effective surveillance, prevention, healthcare delivery, and public policy.A major theme emerging from this collection is that airborne toxicants exert effects far beyond the respiratory tract. Zhang et al., demonstrated that even low levels of PM₂.₅ exposure were associated with increased emergency department visits for cardiovascular disease, reinforcing evidence that adverse health effects may occur even at relatively low exposure levels. Real-world exposures occur as complex mixtures of particulate matter, metals, allergens, combustion products, volatile organic compounds, and emerging contaminants that interact across biological systems and throughout the life course [2,18,19]. Studies examining combined environmental exposures, multiple chemical sensitivity, and emerging contaminants such as microplastics emphasize the need to move beyond single-contaminant frameworks [20,21]. Together, these findings support the emerging exposome framework, which recognizes that cumulative environmental exposures interact with biological, occupational, and behavioral factors to shape disease risk and progression [1,2,19].Military Veterans represent a pivotal sentinel population for understanding the long-term consequences of complex inhalational exposures [7][8][9]. Service members deployed to combat environments encountered unique combinations of burn pit emissions, combustion products, desert dust, blast overpressure, and other environmental hazards under conditions rarely experienced by civilian populations. Military populations provide a unique natural experiment in complex exposure biology [9]. These observations underscore the importance of integrating injury epidemiology with exposure science, environmental toxicology, clinical medicine, and public health to better characterize exposure-disease relationships, identify sentinel events, strengthen surveillance systems, and improve prevention and healthcare delivery [3,9,15,17]. Lessons learned from military populations may ultimately inform responses to broader environmental and occupational health challenges [9,22].A major conceptual advance emerging from this Research Topic is the recognition that environmental and occupational exposures should increasingly be viewed through the lens of safety science and systems thinking [17,23]. Much as patient safety has evolved from blaming individual clinicians toward understanding latent organizational failures, environmental disease prevention requires moving beyond individual behavior toward identifying weaknesses in the design of workplaces, technologies, regulatory systems, and organizational culture that shape exposure risk. [24].Generating evidence alone rarely changes practice. Successful exposure prevention depends upon implementation strategies that facilitate adoption, sustainability, stakeholder engagement, organizational readiness, continuous evaluation, and policy translation. Similar to adverse events in healthcare and other highrisk industries, exposure-related disease often emerges through interactions among multiple system-level factors rather than from a single hazard or failure [24,25]. Generating evidence alone rarely changes practice. Successful exposure prevention depends upon implementation strategies that facilitate adoption, sustainability, stakeholder engagement, organizational readiness, continuous evaluation, and policy translation [16,26,27].Studies by Genovese et al., Caban-Martinez et al., and Rumi et al. illustrate the value of moving beyond traditional hazard identification toward integrated approaches incorporating exposure surveillance, risk anticipation, organizational learning, and resilience-based prevention strategies. Applying systems-oriented approaches to environmental and occupational health may improve exposure characterization, facilitate earlier disease recognition, strengthen prevention strategies, and inform more effective public health and policy interventions [3,23].The contributions within this Research Topic highlight how rapidly evolving environmental conditions are creating increasingly complex exposure challenges. Studies by Caban-Martinez et al. underscore the occupational risks faced by firefighters and fire investigators, while work by Penuelas et al. demonstrates how climate change, urbanization, and changing built environments are reshaping environmental exposure landscapes. First responders, healthcare workers, emergency personnel, and disaster response teams occupy a uniquely vulnerable position at the intersection of occupational health and environmental disaster response and may serve as essential sentinel populations for understanding the long-term consequences of repeated environmental exposures [13,22,28]. Protecting these populations will require advances in exposure assessment, surveillance, disaster preparedness, occupational health systems, injury epidemiology, and resilience science [22,23,29].The studies assembled in this Research Topic reinforce the growing recognition that environmental and occupational exposures are not merely toxicologic phenomena, but complex biological, public health, economic, and societal challenges with consequences that may extend across multiple organ systems, populations, and generations [3,4,15,29,30]. Overall, these investigations support a shift away from traditional paradigms toward integrated approaches that account for complex exposures, multisystem disease mechanisms, human factors, and systems-based prevention strategies [2,17,23]. Like adverse events in healthcare, occupational exposures often emerge from latent organizational conditions, weak regulatory oversight, production pressures, communication failures, inadequate surveillance, and poorly designed work systems rather than isolated unsafe acts [24,25].The importance of convergence science extends beyond scientific advancement. Coordinated efforts spanning epidemiology, toxicology, engineering, environmental science, medicine, and public policy have produced major improvements in global health, including reductions in tobacco-related disease, elimination of leaded gasoline, improvements in occupational safety, and mitigation of ozone depletion through the Montreal Protoco l [3,16,29]. Conversely, failures to recognize and respond to asbestos exposure, lead toxicity, environmental injustice, climate change, and military toxic exposures have resulted in preventable disease, disability, premature mortality, and substantial societal costs [3,15,22,30].Emerging digital technologies including wearable sensors, environmental monitoring networks, electronic health records, geospatial analytics, and artificial intelligence offer unprecedented opportunities for real-time exposure surveillance and earlier disease recognition, provided they are implemented within trustworthy governance frameworks [15,31,32]. Invisible hazards demand visible systems. The future of environmental and occupational health will depend not only on discovering new toxicants but on redesigning the systems in which people live, work, and receive care [17,23]. Protecting future generations will require convergence not only of scientific disciplines but of policy, engineering, clinical medicine, occupational health, communities, and society itself [16,29].Environmental exposure science should evolve into a learning health system that continuously detects hazards, implements preventive interventions, evaluates outcomes, and redesigns policy. Integrating environmental monitoring, clinical outcomes, occupational surveillance, and policy feedback into continuously improving prevention strategies will help inspire, engage and support sustainable practices. The next frontier is not exposure science alone, but exposure intelligence: integrating surveillance, implementation science, systems engineering, and public policy to protect future generations.