Key result
LysRS variants Y280F and F426W boost AEC resistance ~200-fold over wild-type in E. coli.
Why the study?
Structural and functional diversity among aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases may underlie resistance mechanisms against antibiotic amino acid analogues like S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine (AEC).
LysRS is the primary cellular target of the antibiotic AEC, and resistance is mediated by decreased binding affinity in LysRS variants or indirectly via L box mutations increasing cellular lysine pools.
LysRS mutations confirm it as AEC target; leaves open translation to clinical antibiotic development.
Structural and functional diversity among the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases prevent infiltration of the genetic code by noncognate amino acids. To explore whether these same features distinguish the synthetases as potential sources of resistance against antibiotic amino acid analogues, we investigated bacterial growth inhibition by S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine (AEC). Wild-type lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) and a series of active site variants were screened for their ability to restore growth of an Escherichia coli LysRS null strain at increasing concentrations of AEC. While wild-type E. coli growth is completely inhibited at 5 microM AEC, two LysRS variants, Y280F and F426W, provided substantial resistance and allowed E. coli to grow in the presence of up to 1 mM AEC. Elevated resistance did not reflect changes in the kinetics of amino acid activation or tRNA (Lys) aminoacylation, which showed at best 4-6-fold improvements, but instead correlated with the binding affinity for AEC, which was decreased approximately 50-fold in the LysRS variants. In addition to changes in LysRS, AEC resistance has also been attributed to mutations in the L box riboswitch, which regulates expression of the lysC gene, encoding aspartokinase. The Y280F and F426W LysRS mutants contained wild-type L box riboswitches that responded normally to AEC in vitro, indicating that LysRS is the primary cellular target of this antibiotic. These findings suggest that the AEC resistance conferred by L box mutations is an indirect effect resulting from derepression of lysC expression and increased cellular pools of lysine, which results in more effective competition with AEC for binding to LysRS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ataide et al. (2007) studied Antibiotic resistance. LysRS variants (Y280F and F426W) vs. Wild-type LysRS was evaluated on Bacterial growth in the presence of AEC. LysRS variants Y280F and F426W provided substantial resistance to S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine (AEC), allowing E. coli to grow in up to 1 mM AEC compared to 5 microM for wild-type.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: