Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 6, 2025BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingOpen Access

Risk stratification and prediction of emergency delivery in early-onset preeclampsia using machine learning

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

XGBoost model predicts 48-hour emergency delivery in early-onset preeclampsia with ~0.91 AUROC.

  • AUROC 0.908
  • n=648

Why the study?

Early-onset preeclampsia poses significant risks for maternal and fetal outcomes, particularly when emergency delivery is required, necessitating improved prediction methods.

Population

648 singleton pregnancies diagnosed with early-onset preeclampsia at 28-34 weeks gestation

Comparison

Emergency delivery within 48 hours post-diagnosis vs non-emergency delivery

Design

Retrospective cohort study with machine learning model development and evaluation

Follow-up

48 hours post-diagnosis

Authors

YXYanhong XuXLXinying LiuYZYing Zhang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support risk stratification for emergency delivery in early-onset preeclampsia; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=648)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

P
Population
648 pregnant women with early-onset preeclampsia and singleton pregnancies at 28 to 34 weeks gestation, retrospectively analyzed to predict the need for emergency delivery within 48 hours of diagnosis.
E
Exposure
Machine learning predictive models (including XGBoost, GBDT, logistic regression, naïve Bayes, LightGBM, SVM, MLP, elastic net) using 16 clinical and biochemical predictors
O
Outcome
Emergency delivery (≤ 48 h post-diagnosis)

Main Result

Effect estimate: AUROC 0.908

Machine learning models, particularly XGBoost, can accurately predict the need for emergency delivery within 48 hours in early-onset preeclampsia using routine clinical and laboratory features.

Limitations

  • Retrospective design might introduce selection bias, necessitating prospective validation.
  • Single-center sample requires external validation with multi-center data.
  • Emerging biomarkers (e.g., placental growth factor) were not included.
  • Retrospective design
  • Single-center study
  • Lack of prospective validation
  • PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) not included as it is not part of standard workflow

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Early-onset preeclampsia (n=648). XGBoost machine learning model vs. Other machine learning models was evaluated on Prediction of emergency delivery (≤ 48 h post-diagnosis) (AUROC 0.908). An XGBoost machine learning model effectively predicted emergency delivery within 48 hours in early-onset preeclampsia with a testing AUROC of 0.908, identifying CRP, D-dimer, and hypoproteinemia as key predictors.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aacbb4e47564697cdb0dce8https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03249-4
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prediction model of preeclampsia using machine learning based methods: a population based cohort study in China2024 · 31 citations
  2. 2A comprehensive first-trimester predictive model for preeclampsia based on multi-indicators and machine learning: A retrospective single-center study2025 · 6 citations
  3. 3Machine Learning for Dynamic and Short-term Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Prediction of Delivery Within 7 Days After Diagnosis of Early Onset Preeclampsia Using Machine-Learning Models2022 · 24 citations
  5. 5Prediction of pre-eclampsia with machine learning approaches: Leveraging important information from routinely collected data2024 · 21 citations