Key result
Tailored atrioventricular interval programming during left bundle branch pacing decreased median QRS duration to 124 ms compared to 142 ms with non-tailored programming.
Why the study?
Information on programming the atrioventricular interval during left bundle branch pacing is scarce despite known benefits of AV interval optimization in biventricular pacing for CRT.
Does tailored AV interval programming improve electrical resynchronization (QRS width and activation times) in patients receiving left bundle branch pacing for CRT indication?
Observational (n=10)
Does tailored AV interval programming improve electrical resynchronization (QRS width and activation times) in patients receiving left bundle branch pacing for CRT indication?
Absolute Event Rate: 124% vs 142%
Tailoring the AV interval during left bundle branch pacing significantly improves electrical resynchronization by shortening QRS duration and ventricular activation times.
Background Optimization of biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with fusion (fusion‐optimized intervals method) has been shown to improve left ventricular remodeling. However, information on programming the atrioventricular (AV) interval during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is scarce. Objective Assess with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) the electrical benefit of optimization of the AV interval during LBBP. Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Pilot study including patients who received LBBP with CRT indication, normal AV conduction, sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. ECGI was used to obtain non‐invasive activation maps, ventricular activation times, and QRS widths during the optimization of the AV interval. Results A total of 10 patients who received LBBP were included. Median age was 62 years (57–74 years), 40% were women, 20% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and baseline LVEF was 29% (23%–36%). The baseline median QRS duration was 178 ms (168–187 ms), with a left ventricular activation time (LVAT) of 99 ms (90–109 ms), a right ventricular activation time (RVAT) of 42 ms (34–71 ms), and a total ventricular activation time (TAT) of 111 ms (105–131 ms). A non‐tailored AV programming showed a QRS measured from intrinsic deflection of 142 ms (137–149 ms); when a tailored AV was programmed, the median QRS decreased to 124 ms (116–130 ms). Ventricular activation times showed shortening with a tailored approach. Conclusion AV interval adjustment during left bundle branch pacing may result in better resynchronization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pujol‐López et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Left bundle branch block with CRT indication (n=10). Tailored atrioventricular (AV) interval programming vs. Non-tailored AV programming was evaluated on QRS duration. Tailored atrioventricular interval programming during left bundle branch pacing decreased median QRS duration to 124 ms compared to 142 ms with non-tailored programming.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: