Key result
Silver ion antimicrobial pacemaker surfaces show no adverse tissue pathology or pacing impairment vs controls.
Why the study?
The rate of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections is increasing faster than implantation rates and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, motivating development of antimicrobial surface treatments.
Does a silver ion-based antimicrobial surface applied to cardiac pacemakers maintain biocompatibility and pacing function in an ovine model?
Does a silver ion-based antimicrobial surface applied to cardiac pacemakers maintain biocompatibility and pacing function in an ovine model?
A silver ion-based antimicrobial surface applied to pacemakers demonstrated basic biocompatibility and preserved pacing function in an ovine model over 12 weeks.
Supports preclinical safety of silver-coated pacemakers in sheep; leaves open human translation pending clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION: Evidence suggests that the rate of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections is increasing more rapidly than the rates of CIED implantation and is associated with considerable mortality, morbidity and health economic impact. Antimicrobial surface treatments are being developed for CIEDs to reduce the risk of postimplantation infection within the subcutaneous implant pocket. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: muscle using an ovine model for 12 weeks. Pacemaker function was monitored preimplantation and postimplantation. RESULTS: Neither local infection nor systemic toxicity were detected in antimicrobial or control devices, and surrounding tissues showed no abnormal pathology or over-reactivity. Semiquantitative scores of membrane formation, cellular orientation and vascularity were applied over five regions of the pacemaker capsule and average scores compared. Results showed no significant difference between antimicrobially processed and control pacemakers. Silver analysis of whole blood at 7 days found that levels were a maximum of 10 parts per billion (ppb) for one sample, more typically ≤2 ppb, compared with <<2 ppb for preimplantation levels, well below reported toxic levels. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of adverse or abnormal pathology in tissue surrounding antimicrobially processed pacemakers, or deleterious effect on basic pacing capabilities and parameters at 12 weeks. This proof of concept study provides evidence of basic biocompatibility and feasibility of applying this silver ion-based antimicrobial surface to a titanium pacemaker surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shawcross et al. (2017) studied Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. Silver ion-based antimicrobial surface technology vs. Control pacemakers was evaluated on Biocompatibility and pacing function. Silver ion-based antimicrobial surface technology applied to pacemakers showed no adverse tissue pathology or deleterious effect on pacing capabilities compared to controls at 12 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: