Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigated the role of arachidonic acid-derived eicosanoids in staphylococcal alpha-toxin (alpha-T)-induced lung injury. Bolus injection of 200 and 500 micrograms alpha-T into isolated perfused rat lungs resulted in increased pulmonary perfusion pressure followed by lung weight gain. Inhibition of pressure change with papaverine (10(-4) M) failed to abolish lung edema. Furthermore, alpha-T increased the permeability-surface area product in papaverine-treated lungs and caused marked endothelial cell injury and interstitial edema as documented by electron microscopy. alpha-T dose dependently increased lung tissue thromboxane B2 (TxB2) levels and leukotriene C4 levels. In lungs given 0, 200, and 500 micrograms of alpha-T, TxB2 (in micrograms/g wet lung) values were 16.3 +/- 2.8, 25.0 +/- 3.0, and 54.2 +/- 6.2; and leukotriene C4 values were 4.6 +/- 1.1, 6.7 +/- 1.2, and 22.1 +/- 3.8, respectively. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzyme with indomethacin (10(-5) M) or lipoxygenase enzyme with 2(12-hydroxydodeca-5,10-dinyl)-3,5,6-trimethyl-1,4-benzoq uin one (AA861, 10(-5) M) attenuated the vasoconstriction and prevented lung edema due to low dose (200 micrograms) but not high dose (500 micrograms) alpha-T. The protective effect of these inhibitors on lung edema is in part due to decreases in alpha-T-stimulated venoconstriction because alpha-T-induced increase in lung microvascular pressure was attenuated by indomethacin and AA861 pretreatment. We conclude that both eicosanoid-dependent and eicosanoid-independent mechanisms contribute to alpha-T-induced lung edema in the rat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: