Key result
XGBoost outperforms traditional logistic regression in predicting MI with an ROC of 0.86.
Why the study?
Myocardial infarction is common with high morbidity and mortality, and the study assessed if explainable AI (XGBoost) could outperform traditional logistic regression in MI prediction.
Does an XGBoost machine learning model outperform traditional logistic regression in predicting myocardial infarction in a large population cohort?
Cohort (n=502,506)
Yes
Does an XGBoost machine learning model outperform traditional logistic regression in predicting myocardial infarction in a large population cohort?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.86% vs 0.77%
The XGBoost machine learning model outperformed traditional logistic regression in predicting the risk of myocardial infarction in a large population cohort, offering explainability through SHAPley values.
XGBoost may improve MI risk discrimination versus logistic regression; leaves open clinical utility and requires prospective validation.
Background and objective Myocardial infarction is common and associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study assessed if “Explainable AI” in the form of extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) could outperform traditional logistic regression in predicting myocardial infarction (MI) in a large cohort. Methods We compared two machine learning methods, XGBoost and logistic regression in predicting risk of MI. The UK Biobank is a population-based prospective cohort including 502 506 volunteers with active consent, aged 40–69 years at recruitment from 2006 to 2010. These subjects were followed until end of 2019 and the primary outcome was myocardial infarction. Results Both models were trained using 90% of the cohort. The remaining 10% was used as a test set. Both models were equally precise, but the regression model classified more of the healthy class correctly. XGBoost was more accurate in identifying individuals who later suffered a myocardial infarction. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) scores are class size invariant. In this metric XGBoost outperformed the logistic regression model, with ROC scores of 0.86 (accuracy 0.75; precision 0.99 and recall 0.75 for the healthy class; precision 0.07 and recall 0.81 for the MI-class) compared to 0.77 (accuracy 0.77; precision 0.99 and recall 0.77 for the healthy class; precision 0.07 and recall 0.78). Secondly, we demonstrate how SHAPley values can be used to visualize and interpret the predictions made by XGBoost models, both for the cohort test set and for individuals. Conclusions The XGBoost machine learning model shows very promising results in evaluating risk of MI in a large and diverse population. This model can be used, and visualized, both for individual assessments and in larger cohorts. The predictions made by the XGBoost models, points towards a future where “Explainable AI” may help to bridge the gap between medicine and data science.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=502,506). XGBoost machine learning model vs. Logistic regression model was evaluated on Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) score for predicting myocardial infarction. The XGBoost machine learning model outperformed traditional logistic regression in predicting myocardial infarction, achieving a receiver operator characteristic score of 0.86 compared to 0.77.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: