Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Often described as "masks" face-worn devices are employed as personal protection equipment by health workers and the general public and considered to be an indispensable technology against epidemics. Simultaneously, they are potent symbols of existential risk. Could these material and visual aspects be more than simply indexically connected? In this article, I examine these apparatuses through a historical anthropological approach of their invention during the 1910-11 Manchurian plague outbreak. Arguing that they should be taken seriously as masks, I demonstrate that their emergence was rooted in their configuration as transformative agents of medical reason.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christos Lynteris (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: